|
[Sponsors] |
Cd for flow over a cylinder in low Re=0.08, laminar steady flow |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 12, 2024, 14:31 |
Cd for flow over a cylinder in low Re=0.08, laminar steady flow
|
#1 |
New Member
Sofia M
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I want to compare the Cd from literature review (lambs solution for flow over a cylinder at low reynolds number values) to the Fluent 2D simulation results.
The values that I am using are Cylinder diameter = 0.2 mm Velocity = 0.254 m/s Reynolds number of the cylinder (Re<0.1) = 0.08 The fluid is glycerin with the default values from the FluentDataBase. My mesh is very defined with 540536 cells and with a sizing in the cylinder walls of 200 divisions I am letting the solver run for +10,000 iterations. The results for Cd that im obtaining are around 200 without the residuals converging below 1e-8. If i let the iterations to continue the continuity residuals stay rather constant at around 1e-6. For reference values the area Im using is 0.0002 m2 (with the default value for depth as 1m). I am using SIMPLE method. I dont know what else should I modifiy to obtained a faster convergence and a lower Cd (my desire value is 69.4) I wish someone could help me spot the error or what am I missing to obtain the right value. |
|
Tags |
2d cylinder, drag coefficient, flow over a cylinder, laminar floww, low reynolds number |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow past a 2D cylinder - High Re (1E+05) - Cd too high | Pervispasco | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | March 14, 2022 03:19 |
flow over a cylinder urgent! | kevin | FLUENT | 8 | August 11, 2015 14:00 |
fixed circular cylinder for a steady flow in lamina regime: getting strange Cd values | virtuoso | FLUENT | 1 | February 4, 2015 10:45 |
flow around a cylinder | pXYZ | Main CFD Forum | 14 | July 25, 2011 11:05 |
Steady state vs. mean transient analysis of flow behind a circular cylinder | Heini | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 9, 2011 07:47 |