|
[Sponsors] |
Periodic Baffle Minor Loss: models, wall treatment, convergence |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 19, 2024, 15:45 |
Periodic Baffle Minor Loss: models, wall treatment, convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
Andrew
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
I am interested in determining the minor loss associated with steady flow through a channel around alternating baffles for different baffle lengths and spacing (ideally within 2-3 significant figures). Using ANSYS Fluent 2021 R2, I have set up a periodic inlet/outlet condition targeting a specific flow rate, such that Re > 2e3 (based on hydraulic diameter). My primary concerns are: (1) which viscous model is best suited for the flow described (2) whether I have the correct near-wall treatment (3) how to know if my results are sufficiently converged (4) if there is a preferred solver for the given model and flow conditions. I was thinking to use realizable k-epsilon or k-omega SST, but I was wondering if anyone had an intuitive sense of which model would be best suited to this flow. In the event that I use a k-epsilon model, I was also wondering whether standard wall functions or enhance wall treatment is more suitable. I am thinking that I do not need to resolve the viscous sub-layer, since my interest is more in the overall periodic pressure drop across the inlet/outlet, so I was thinking to use standard wall functions. However, I don't really know how the bulk flow condition and measured pressure drop might depend on the wall treatment. From simulations that I have run with realizable k-epsilon and standard wall treatment, the solution seems to converge rapidly, with scaled residuals below 1e-6 for the shorter baffle lengths (fixed spacing). However, for longer baffles I can only get scaled residuals below 1e-3 (largest residual representing continuity). In both cases, a monitor of average wall shear and inlet pressure do reach steady values. Nevertheless, I am uncertain as to whether the reported pressure drop in these cases can be trusted. There are some values in the literature as well as experimental values that I can compare against, but only for a select range of geometries. I tend not to think of this as a meshing issue, since it is a fairly simple geometry, I was able to obtain good mesh quality for all hex elements within the recommended y+ for the standard wall functions. In any case, I appreciate any insights on the above points. To illustrate the flow geometry, I attaching an illustration of the flow domain. Thanks for the help, and let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Andrew |
|
Tags |
periodic, viscous models, wall treatment |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ansys CFD-Post Application Error | rushiCFD | FLUENT | 0 | March 21, 2021 08:51 |
Wall boundary conditions for the automatic wall treatment function for K-omega models | TCosta | CONVERGE | 3 | May 25, 2017 11:29 |
Turbulence Near wall Treatment: can standard treatment be used for y+ between 1 to 5? | mohibanwar | FLUENT | 9 | August 30, 2015 02:11 |
On the LES near wall treatment | huangxianbei | FLUENT | 8 | August 27, 2014 12:13 |
Error finding variable "THERMX" | sunilpatil | CFX | 8 | April 26, 2013 08:00 |