|
[Sponsors] |
Modelling Two Phase Stirred Tank Reactor Using VOF & Steady State |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 23, 2023, 07:13 |
Modelling Two Phase Stirred Tank Reactor Using VOF & Steady State
|
#1 |
Member
ASR
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 3 |
Hello,
I am currently looking at modelling an unbaffled two phase (air-water) stirred tank reactor using a homogeneous eulerian-eulerian VOF method in FLUENT based on a case study from the literature (DOI:10.1021/ie051021a). I am solving using an implicit method and steady state solution (as opposed to transient and explicit) as the paper managed to model the reactor using steady state. Other models/solver settings I am also using are: PISO solver for pressure-velocity coupling, standard k-epsilon, first order discretisation schemes for convective terms, PRESTO! for pressure; Modified HRIC for VOF. When I ran the simulation for different flow speeds ranging (from a-e): 0 RPM, 100 RO, 140 RPM, 195 RPM, 240 RPM, I noticed that the depression of the vortex is too small (as can be seen from contours in ZX plane). Also from the isosurface contours, the air-water interface (for vortex) is wavy when typically in papers it is flat and I do not know why this is. I have attached some images from my simulation results and the literature paper as a comparison and also my residuals plot (which to me appeared converged). I would appreciate any guidance as I am new to modelling stirred tank reactors. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
VOF modelling, water drainage from an elevated tank | ashraf88 | FLUENT | 5 | November 29, 2013 09:05 |
VOF modelling, water drainage from an elevated tank | ashraf88 | Fluent Multiphase | 0 | November 28, 2013 07:44 |
modeling free surface in stirred tank by VOF | jamalf64 | FLUENT | 1 | October 6, 2012 13:29 |
VOF steady state? | CFD Newbie | Main CFD Forum | 3 | December 16, 2002 01:23 |