|
[Sponsors] |
March 22, 2023, 18:18 |
Ahmed body simulation (steady-state)
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 4 |
Hello,
For my thesis, I have to simulate the aerodynamics of a cornering vehicle but to get used to doing external aerodynamics I have decided to first simulate the aerodynamics of an Ahmed body on a straight line in a wind tunnel. I am using the SST k-omega model for this simulation. I have tried to do this by using the wind tunnel dimensions given in the following paper (15 m x 1.87 m x 1.4 m): https://www.researchgate.net/publica...the_Ahmed_body The problem I have right now is that either the residuals become constant after a number of iterations-specifically the continuity residual does not fall below the 1e-3 threshold- or the simulation converges but I don't obtain the correct drag and lift coefficients. Additionally, during the simulation the lift and drag coefficients have small oscillations. Below are the specifics of the simulation setup and the mesh and also some of my attempts at fixing the problem: For the mesh Method: Tetrahedral General element size: 60 mm Body sizing using body of influence (size): 20 mm Face sizing (the Ahemd body): 5 mm Inflation layer: First layer thickness is 9e-3 mm with 20 layers in total. Boundary conditions Inlet: velocity inlet at 40 m/s. Turbulent intensity 0.1% and Turbulent length scale 0.073 m Outlet: pressure outlet Wind tunnel walls: symmetry Ground: no-slip wall Car: no-slip wall Reference values https://imgur.com/a/evpnJBl URF Please see the attachments I have tried refining the mesh to what is below but I get a similar behavior for the residuals. Method: Tetrahedral General element size: 30 mm Body sizing using body of influence (size): 10 mm Face sizing (the Ahemd body): 5 mm Inflation layer: First layer thickness is 9e-3 mm with 20 layers in total. I have also tried to reduce the momentum equation URF which helps with the convergence but leads to incorrect drag and lift coefficients. One thing that I observed was the high value of the y+ value on the ground segment in the area where the body of influence is not present, the value was in the order of magnitude 1e2 which is very high. I have tried to further refine the mesh on the ground but the number of elements becomes very large, so far I am observing the same residual behavior as before and the lift and drag coefficients are still oscillating. At this point I am not sure what is causing the problem. Any help and guidance is greatly appreciated. Best, Amir |
|
March 24, 2023, 18:26 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 4 |
In case anyone comes across a case like this, please follow this tutorial. It helped me with fixing the mesh and setting up the simulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91bonD180ls |
|
Tags |
aerodynamic analysis, ahmed body, convergance, drag and lift, fluent |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What are the best settings for a channel flow simulation? | Ashkan Kashani | CFX | 3 | October 13, 2022 22:36 |
Ahmed Body Validation Study – Autodesk CFD | Nik CFD | Autodesk Simulation CFD | 3 | February 12, 2021 05:29 |
The difference between steady state and transient | JuPa | CFX | 36 | December 9, 2019 23:50 |
Steady state simpleFOAM crash | Galactus | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | August 14, 2019 07:06 |
Different Pressure in steady state and tranisente simulation | abcdefgh | CFX | 4 | January 29, 2015 17:47 |