|
[Sponsors] |
May 10, 2022, 14:27 |
Redefine First SST Blending Function
|
#1 |
New Member
Jonas
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 6 |
Good evening,
TLDR Is it possible to modify the definition of the first SST blending function in Fluent? Problem description I am encountering an issue where the first SST blending function remains in k-omega regime far away from the wall. My understanding is that for well-behaved flows, the first SST blending function is meant to switch to k-epsilon as soon as permissible, given the constraints of the epsilon model (so between y+ = 30 and 300?), but with some margin of safety. Based on a manual definition of the blending function in CFD Post, I have been able to determine that this occurs due to the first sub-argument of the blending function, which is supposed to activate the k-omega model in the log-layer. I'm currently working in CFX, where changing the blending function is definitely not possible. I'm wondering whether Fluent is more flexible in this regard. Links to any publications with alternate blending function definitions are very welcome! Many thanks for any input on this! |
|
Tags |
blending function f1, sst k-omega, strain rate, yplus |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error in enabling the python wrapper | Jinn | SU2 Installation | 2 | April 23, 2022 14:52 |
[snappyHexMesh] Invalid Normals for source face to target face while making AMI? | Sorabh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | August 3, 2021 07:35 |
[swak4Foam] installation problem with version 0.2.3 | Claudio87 | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 9 | May 8, 2013 11:20 |
channelFoam for a 3D pipe | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 24, 2011 14:06 |
latest OpenFOAM-1.6.x from git failed to compile | phsieh2005 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 25 | February 9, 2010 05:37 |