|
[Sponsors] |
February 9, 2022, 23:36 |
Contra-rotating moving mesh zones
|
#1 |
New Member
Nathan CHEN
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi all,
I am simulating a pair of contra-rotating propeller using single-passage domain. First I did the calculation using steady pressure-based coupled solver with moving reference frame (MRF) and mixing plane interface. Then I switched it to transient case and changed to moving mesh zones, but this time the calculation broke immediately and Fluent said this: Node 1: Process 9092: Received signal SIGSEGV. No matter I tried the interface with periodic repeats, pitch change, or no pitch change types, there was just no change, i.e., still breaking immediately. It seems that Fluent does not allow two mesh motion zones together. If I tried one moving mesh zone and one MRF zone, things would go well and the calculation could proceed. Does anyone know the reason for this and how to solve it? Any help from you would be highy appreciated. Many thanks, Nathan Last edited by Saintree; February 9, 2022 at 23:38. Reason: typo |
|
Tags |
contra-rotating propeller, mesh motion, moving mesh, sliding mesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
Rotating Cylinder (Moving wall vs Moving reference frame vs Sliding mesh) | hamed.majeed | FLUENT | 2 | January 17, 2017 13:18 |
Moving Wall, MRF or Sliding Mesh for modelling rotating rim and tyre? | Field85 | FLUENT | 3 | March 18, 2016 11:09 |
[Other] How to set up a dynamic mesh for a piston moving through a tube of variable diameter? | karkar | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | July 4, 2012 07:54 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |