|
[Sponsors] |
Time Scale Factor - Any negative effect to setting to large? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 5, 2021, 10:37 |
Time Scale Factor - Any negative effect to setting to large?
|
#1 |
New Member
David
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 5 |
Hello,
I have a simulation with a very large temperature distribution (between room temp and about 1500 C). The computational domain is a cylinder with some internal hardware about 70 inches long a few inches in diameter. There are some very low flows going through the cylinder (laminar regime). Flow velocities stabilize quickly, but temperatures usually take a very long time to stabilize. With with time scale factor set to 1 usually I have to leave it overnight to get any result. Recently I got the courage to bump the TSF up to 10, then 100 and then 1000. Now my strategy is as follows: 5 - 10 iterations with TSF = 1 Bump TSF to 100 (or 1000) and iterate until temps start to stabilize Reduce TSF to 1 and iterate until convergence Is there any "risk" of bumping the TSF like this? It has been an effective way to converge faster (~ 200 iterations vs. 2000+ iterations) and speed up my work, and the results appear reasonable. Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[General] Extracting ParaView Data into Python Arrays | Jeffzda | ParaView | 30 | November 6, 2023 22:00 |
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 10, 2013 10:34 |
channelFoam for a 3D pipe | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM | 3 | June 24, 2011 14:06 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |