|
[Sponsors] |
January 5, 2021, 15:04 |
Overset Meshing in 3D
|
#1 |
Member
Pierce
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 7 |
Hello,
I have an overset grid in 3D that keeps crashing on intilization. This grid is essentially a wake refinement that stretches from the trailing edge of a wing downstream. The simulation is for steady subsonic flow, and when extracting the symmetry plane, one can successfully run the simulation in 2D with the overset plane. However, as I introduce this to 3D the simulation will not initialize properly and will instead crash. I'm wondering if having the overset mesh flush with the symmetry plane has anything to do with that. For the boundary of the overset that touches the symmetry plane I also define this to have a symmetry plane BC. Attached is the symmetry plane with the 2 meshes clearly identifiable. Thanks and I hope someone can help. Pierce |
|
July 7, 2021, 04:42 |
Overset meshing in 3D with symmetry plane
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi Pierce,
Did you solved this problem ? And if yes, how? I am facing the same issue as you. I want to simulate a ship in a wave field with a symmetry plane and overset mesh in 3D around the ship. I defined the boundary of the overset mesh flush with the symmetry plane as a symmetry BC as you but it keeps crashing. Hope you can help me! Best regards, Alix |
|
July 13, 2021, 20:15 |
|
#3 | |
Member
Pierce
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 40
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
Hi Alix, I did manage to get around this, it seems like the symmetry plane interacting with an overset causes a memory leak. I was running on computing clusters and the job wasn't ending properly which led to further issues down the line so make sure you clear the memory. As for my solution, I simply mirrored the non overset component of the mesh, removing the need for a symmetry plane. Let me know your thoughts and we can discuss via message if you'd like. Pierce |
||
March 30, 2022, 16:32 |
|
#4 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
A symmetry on the overset mesh is also wrong and is not supported by fluent. In the case of symmetry, there must be a geometric gap between the overset mesh and the plane of symmetry. If not, the zones should not be defined as a symmetry boundary condition for the overset mesh, but must be defined as an overset wall. With the reporting of orphan cells at the symmetry plane |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Overset meshing problem in Fluent | B_L_ | FLUENT | 4 | November 16, 2020 02:06 |
Alternatives to using overset meshing | MikeWorth | OpenFOAM | 2 | August 20, 2020 10:04 |
[Other] Overset axisymmetric meshing | MikeWorth | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | June 11, 2020 06:37 |
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder | Nutrex | Main CFD Forum | 4 | July 29, 2008 12:03 |
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid | ken | FLUENT | 0 | September 4, 2003 12:08 |