|
[Sponsors] |
November 26, 2020, 03:03 |
Solution relaxation factors
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello,
I am simulating a steady state laminar flow inside a reactor operating at low Pressure and high temperature. If I use low value of momentum URF (0.2 in my case) my solution gets converged up to 10-14 and net fluxes are almost 0 and point monitors also gets steady. But if I increase the URF value from 0.2 to 0.3 and re run my solution gives me convergence only up to 10-1 and my fluxes are also not close to zero. My question is can I trust the solutions obtained from low value of URFs? Regards. |
|
November 26, 2020, 06:39 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lorenzo Galieti
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 12 |
If you decrease the relaxation factors of course the solution is going to change less iteration by iteration so the residuals are going to be lower. Unless you are dealing with very complicated flow (and yours is not), I would not change them, it will only make your simulation time longer
The point is that you shouldn’t use the residuals to judge convergence but rather set up some probes at 3-4 points in the domain and monitor quantities of interest (e.g velocity and temperature) there. If the values don’t change if you iterate more and the residuals are reasonably low (10-6) then you can say the solution is converged |
|
Tags |
fluent, urfs |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UDF for Automatic Solution Initialization for previous case data file | gartz89 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | March 30, 2020 08:38 |
Are Relaxation factors applicable to rhoCentralFoam? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | May 24, 2018 10:17 |
field versus equation under relaxation factors | mihaipruna | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | February 1, 2016 06:08 |
Under Relaxation Factors in CFX Pre | akj | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 15, 2011 02:50 |
Relaxation Factors | Tim | Phoenics | 3 | June 30, 2004 03:03 |