|
[Sponsors] |
October 5, 2020, 01:42 |
Porous Media Zone Thickness
|
#1 |
New Member
Emily Blanch
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello, I am looking to model a region of my model with a porous media. The region consists of a tube that contracts into another tube, of smaller diameter. The tube with smaller diameter contains trip strips, and ultimately dumps to a series of small holes. I have dp vs velocity information for the combined effect of the contraction into the smaller cylinder, the trip strips, and the small holes. I am looking to replace the smaller tube with a porous media.
I only really care about capturing the pressure drop due to the porous media in my model, which lead me to think I could use a porous jump boundary. However, from what I understand, a porous jump boundary can only be used on an internal boundary interface. This would not work for my case, as I am looking to define the porous media downstream static pressure as a boundary condition. Since I must use a porous media zone (instead of a porous jump), I am looking to define the porous zone as small as possible to save on cell count. My question is, when calculating the porous media zone coefficients (viscous & inertial resistances), I must divide by the porous media thickness. Is the porous media thickness the actual physical length of the porous media, or is it the non-physical length of the porous media I created in my model? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FLUENT porous zone inputs | eishinsnsayshin | FLUENT | 19 | April 17, 2020 05:40 |
[Commercial meshers] Mesh conversion problem (fluent3DMeshToFoam) | Aadhavan | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 8, 2018 02:47 |
Porous media setup issues in Fluent | Bernard Van | FLUENT | 29 | January 26, 2017 05:09 |
porous media model validation | Tensian | FLUENT | 0 | September 23, 2016 06:04 |
How to model granular flow through porous media | Axius | FLUENT | 2 | August 7, 2014 11:34 |