|
[Sponsors] |
June 24, 2020, 11:20 |
Mach contour expansion wave wrong
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 6 |
Hello,
I am simulating the hypersonic flow around a 2d wedge at M=8. So far the solution converges but it seems as if Fluent doen't display/calculate the expansion wave at the end of the wedge correctly. What I expect is a rise of the Mach number behind the expansion wave, this doesn't happen, at least that's my interpretation of the contour plot. Maybe this is due to the influence of the for high Mach numbers typical wake space behind the geometry? I have heard that Ansys CFX can have problems regarding this topic but I haven't heard anything similar for Ansys Fluent. Has somebody experience on this and/or can give me a hint where the source of my problem may be? Thank you very much! |
|
June 24, 2020, 17:15 |
Mach Contour
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Do you have any comparable work from the literature? The contours don't look at they should; not just at the wake but even upstream. Do you have fine enough mesh? Which numerical schemes have you used? And are you modeling it as inviscid or viscous flow?
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 24, 2020, 17:26 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi vinerm,
thanks for your reply. I have to mention that this is a wedge with a small radius at the tip. Fluent Settings: Density based implicit Roe-FDS 2. Order Upwind Geen Gauß node based viscous flow, k-w-sst I have around 300000 cells and I have refined the mesh near the geometry. I also implemented a y+<1. I have comparable simulation data for sharp wedges only. That's interesting, I thought that at least everything upstream to the expansion wave was correct. Does this information help you on judging this case? Thanks |
|
June 30, 2020, 04:47 |
|
#4 |
Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 6 |
Does somebody else have an opinion/idea for solving this problem?
Thank you very much. |
|
June 30, 2020, 06:53 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 130
Rep Power: 9 |
The result should be something like this, right?(but without reflecting surface):
Source of the image: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...0093611930336X Have you changed the legend? e.g. between 3-6 Mach ? What about the schlieren image? |
|
Tags |
compressible flow, expansion wave, fluent, hypersonic, wedge |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
udf error | srihari | FLUENT | 1 | October 31, 2016 15:18 |
Rapid expansion of Helium: wrong behavior in regards to Joule-Thomson effect | antb | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | June 25, 2014 12:06 |
wrong contour of pressure at the ailfoil leading edge | s.m | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 21 | August 1, 2013 12:15 |
Wrong wave generation | nuovodna | OpenFOAM | 2 | August 9, 2010 11:53 |
Pressure contour seems wrong??? | Harry Qiu | FLUENT | 1 | June 29, 2001 06:53 |