|
[Sponsors] |
How to enforce zero velocity along walls of rotating channel? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 19, 2020, 11:25 |
How to enforce zero velocity along walls of rotating channel?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 7 |
I am working on rotating turbulent channel flow and have test it for 2D & 3D. However, I keep getting non-zero velocity for the node point at the wall. This causes a sharp transition from wall surface to fluid flow which is unphysical. The solver works fine when I set rotation to zero and thus, I suspect I may have set my rotation incorrectly.
For my 3D solver, I set periodic boundary conditions along x and z directions. The flow is driven by dP/dx=-1 which is specify in the periodic conditions. To introduce rotation, I set the walls at y=-h & y=h to rotate along the z-axis at -20 rad/s. I also try using frame motion instead but the result is much worst. I have no idea how to correctly introduce the rotation. I can't upload the image here and thus, I have add the relevant link. Without rotation, the velocity profile is alright as both of its ends starts from zero. https://imgur.com/oyqMzOs However, with rotation and at a nonzero distance from rotational axis, both ends of the velocity profile is equal to the wall rotational velocity at that point. https://imgur.com/FdGa5fm How do I ensure that both ends of the velocity profile starts from zero? According to the paper I am using, the "wall friction velocity is prescribed and kept constant in all numerical computations" and I believe that is the key to my problem. However, I can't seem to explicitly compute the wall friction velocity on Fluent... |
|
June 19, 2020, 11:56 |
Wall Motion
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
You have set walls to be moving, therefore, it is obvious that the velocities at the nodes on the walls are non-zero. If you don't want that, i.e., if the walls are stationary with respect to inertial frame, then you should set their absolute velocity to 0 or their relative velocity equal and opposite to that of cell zone velocity.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
June 19, 2020, 12:54 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 7 |
Thanks for the response! I resolved it by manually removing the velocity profile from the imposed wall rotation.
|
|
August 5, 2020, 05:45 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6 |
hello cfdnewb123,
Could you please explain in detail how did you solve the problem? I am facing a similar problem. Thank you so much. |
|
Tags |
boundaries condition, mesh, rotation, turbulence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rotating domain vs Wall velocity | Jiricbeng | CFX | 16 | January 30, 2020 10:06 |
3D Rotating Channel | Curtin University | FLUENT | 5 | November 9, 2018 03:25 |
Velocity profile is not turbulent (OPEN CHANNEL FLOW) | roi247 | FLUENT | 2 | March 15, 2017 08:30 |
UDF for 3d velocity inlet profile in channel flow | Thejas4ansys | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | April 1, 2016 16:09 |
rotating channel | emilio | Siemens | 1 | April 6, 2012 01:21 |