|
[Sponsors] |
Why does the result not the same as the verification manuals? |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Heqian Zhao
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Beijing, China
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I set a verification case that is the same as the VMFL008. But the result is not the same as that in the verification manuals.
When I only set the boundary of the rotating cover, the results were right. However, when I set the rotating cover as the moving as well as the cell zone as the rotating frame, the results were not right. But this method was provided by the verification manuals. So, did anyone have the same result as me? ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Did you maintain the directions for the rotation? Lid and cell zone rotate in opposite direction.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem to run simpleFoam using qsub? | be_inspired | OpenFOAM | 1 | December 22, 2015 12:53 |
MRFSimpleFoam result checking | Aadhavan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 8, 2012 04:52 |
Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation | njundale | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 0 | November 6, 2012 00:35 |
How to display the whole result of a periodic model via one period result? | dixylo | FLUENT | 2 | February 23, 2012 04:11 |
Accuracy problem of HO schemes on unstructured mesh, HO scheme gives 1st order result | gemini | Main CFD Forum | 12 | December 27, 2011 21:01 |