Why does the result not the same as the verification manuals?

Heqian Zhao · April 20, 2020, 14:37

I set a verification case that is the same as the VMFL008. But the result is not the same as that in the verification manuals.
When I only set the boundary of the rotating cover, the results were right.
However, when I set the rotating cover as the moving as well as the cell zone as the rotating frame, the results were not right. But this method was provided by the verification manuals.
So, did anyone have the same result as me?

vinerm · April 20, 2020, 16:29

Did you maintain the directions for the rotation? Lid and cell zone rotate in opposite direction.

April 20, 2020, 16:29	Directions	#2
vinerm Senior Member Vinerm Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Nederland Posts: 2,946 Blog Entries: 1 Rep Power: 36	Did you maintain the directions for the rotation? Lid and cell zone rotate in opposite direction. __________________ Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Problem to run simpleFoam using qsub?	be_inspired	OpenFOAM	1	December 22, 2015 13:53
MRFSimpleFoam result checking	Aadhavan	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	0	December 8, 2012 05:52
Difference of result betn Fluent & CFX simulation for S2S radiation	njundale	Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming	0	November 6, 2012 01:35
How to display the whole result of a periodic model via one period result?	dixylo	FLUENT	2	February 23, 2012 05:11
Accuracy problem of HO schemes on unstructured mesh, HO scheme gives 1st order result	gemini	Main CFD Forum	12	December 27, 2011 22:01