|
[Sponsors] |
March 26, 2020, 03:51 |
Laminar Flow - Velocity Profile
|
#1 |
New Member
Babal Cobelt
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 |
I compared the velocity profile of the circular pipe (in ANSYS Fluent) with the velocity profile of the laminar flow in accordance with the theory of the parabolic curve of laminar flow.
In the first case, I only use pipes with mesh in the fluid section only without any solid walls on the edges. Then in the second case, I use the same pipe but by adding a solid wall. By doing a flow simulation only (without an energy calculation) I get different results. The pipe without a solid wall obtained perfect results in accordance with the theory of the parabolic curve of laminar flow, but the pipe with a solid wall there is a difference in the amount of velocity in the area approaching the wall. Why did this happen? |
|
March 26, 2020, 04:46 |
Mesh
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Adding a solid without energy equation does not make a difference. Even if a solid is added and energy equation is solved, as long as temperature is a passive field, it will not have any effect. The effect that you are observing is because of the difference in the meshes.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 26, 2020, 23:22 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Babal Cobelt
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 |
But in this case, I have not entered the energy equation, only a flow simulation, but still the results have a difference when I add a solid wall.
|
|
March 27, 2020, 04:28 |
Solid and Thermal Energy
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
My post states the same; it does NOT matter whether you have the energy equation enabled or not, the presence of solid will not make a difference to the flow profile until the transport properties and density are function of temperature. So, in your case, the difference is purely because of mesh and nothing else.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
March 29, 2020, 23:35 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Babal Cobelt
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 6 |
Thank you for your answer
What if in my case the dimensions of the circular channel are very small (Diameter 3 mm) and I have meshed the smallest size I can make. Is there a way to improve the condition of the mesh? |
|
March 30, 2020, 05:17 |
Mesh Size
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
There is no smallest mesh size that you can make as far as meshing tools are concerned. You can go all the way down to the machine precision, provided RAM of the machine is capable of handling it.
For the time being, I'd suggest you to do one thing. Load the case with solid in Fluent, go to Mesh > Zones > Delete and then delete the solid zone. Run the simulation. Then compare it with the simulation where you have solid included. This way, you will have same mesh for fluid since you use the same case.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
Tags |
ansys fluent, laminar flow, parabolic curve |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Will the results of steady state solver and transient solver be same? | carye | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | December 28, 2019 06:21 |
serial udf to parallel udf | radioss | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 10 | January 19, 2019 09:56 |
High velocity in Laminar flow | Manojmech | FLUENT | 0 | November 3, 2016 05:37 |
Laminar Velocity Profile over a flat plate | Nick R | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 27, 2015 14:39 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 06:13 |