|
[Sponsors] |
February 26, 2020, 21:18 |
How to get full data in reference frames
|
#1 |
New Member
SM
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8 |
Before using multiple reference frames (MRF) to model a bioreactor, I took the practice just for a simplified gas sparging system.
I draw a geometry of a solid tank with an empty space for the sparging body and the surface sparging body. Trial 6. CAD.PNG Q1. For MRF, is this okay to subtract from the solid tank the region for sparging system or impellers? I confirmed that the solid tank without vacant spaces for the sparger was not working for simulation with this error message, 'Flow boundary zone found adjacent to solid zone.' Q2. What should I do to get full data in reference frames? Gray region appeared that it did not have any data in contour graphing. Trial 6.PNG |
|
February 27, 2020, 05:40 |
Mrf
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
You are right in saying that the solid sparger is not required. Only the fluid (you may call it solid but that is in geometric sense only) region around the sparger is required. Gray region represents the place where there are are no values for the field variables, most likely because that region belongs to a solid cell zone and not a fluid cell zone. The boundary of the fluid region itself behaves like the boundary of the sparger, ain't that anyway correct because the fluid is bounded by some solid body? So, in case you have any cell zone that is selected as solid type, then you can delete it from Fluent. Keep only the cell zone that is selected as Fluid under Cell Zone Conditions > Type.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
February 28, 2020, 04:20 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
SM
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
I modified the CAD design of the fluid region (solid type) with the sparger space empty. It was working with this design, thanks. CAPTURE2.PNGCAPTURE.PNGCAPTURE4.PNG But as you know, if the sparger (Φ10) has a smaller hole (Φ3), how do I design the geometry? I additionally insert a hole surface on the top area of the sparger, which, however, missed the inlet and instead can just allow for manipulating contact region. (I previously changed the type of contact region to inlet-vent; boundary conditions>interfaces>contact region --> boundary conditions>inlet>contact region, but the momentum tab was inactivated.) CAPTURE3.PNGCAPTURE5.PNG |
||
February 28, 2020, 04:34 |
Interfaces
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
If the sparger has been removed, you should have only one cell zone and then there cannot be any interfaces. If you have more than one cell zone, then, you need to go back to your CAD tool and ensure that all the bodies belong to single part. Ensure that at the Ansys Meshing stage, if you are using Ansys Meshing, nothing exists in Connections. If there are contacts, delete those. There should not be any interface in your Fluent case.
Secondly, your mesh appears to be too coarse. You may have to refine it. Then, even a hole with 3 will be captured and you will be able to define it as inlet.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
Tags |
geometry, mrf, reactor, sparger |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Simple piston movement in cylinder- fluid models | arun1994 | CFX | 4 | July 8, 2016 03:54 |
Compression stoke is giving higher pressure than calculated | nickjuana | CFX | 62 | May 19, 2015 14:32 |
OpenFOAM 1.6-ext git installation on Ubuntu 11.10 x64 | Attesz | OpenFOAM Installation | 45 | January 13, 2012 13:38 |
OpenFoam-1.7.x on Suse 11.2 (64bit) does not compile | val46 | OpenFOAM Installation | 4 | August 27, 2010 04:43 |