|
[Sponsors] |
compare fluent pressure drop and Ergun equation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 9, 2020, 15:07 |
compare fluent pressure drop and Ergun equation
|
#1 |
New Member
bagh fay
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear
i have run simulation using Euler 2 phase flow , activated both granular and packed bed and specified the diameter for particles then fixed the velocities of the second phase to zero to ensure the bed remain packed and no particle leave the domain based on fluent help in this case Fluet would use the Ergun equation to simulate the pressure drop. my issue is i am getting diffrent results than ergun equation(calculated externaly in excel Sheet and alo checked from calculated sites on the net) for ex the Ergun equation predicted 6000 psi while fluent calculated pressure drop only 500 psi i am just wondering if any one faced this issue before or may be my approuch is wrong any help is much appreciated |
|
February 9, 2020, 16:54 |
Ergun
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Fluent does not use Ergun equation when Euler-Euler model is used; Ergun is not applicable. Ergun equation is used when domain is assumed as porous, which can certainly represent a packed bed. However, when multiphase model with granular phase and packed bed is used, formulation is quite involved.
On the other hand, pressure drop due to Ergun and the formulation used in Fluent should match. The reason for mismatch could be due to multiple reasons, such as the models activated in the secondary phase panel.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
February 9, 2020, 22:11 |
|
#3 |
New Member
bagh fay
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 9 |
Dear vinerm
thank u so much for the promt reply from what i understand from your reply is when packed bed activated in the secondary phase Fluent will use Ergun equation,and this is what i have learned from the Fluent help as well now you mention that the differences may be caused by the settings of the secondary phase panal , do you have any idea what should be the proper setting to get similar results like Ergun equation? regards |
|
February 10, 2020, 10:05 |
Ergun is NOT implemented
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
I apologize in case I mentioned that Ergun is used. What I meant was that Ergun was NOT used by Fluent. However, results should be closer to what Ergun predicts.
__________________
Regards, Vinerm PM to be used if and only if you do not want something to be shared publicly. PM is considered to be of the least priority. |
|
July 9, 2023, 07:00 |
Ergun equation
|
#5 |
New Member
Jochen Ka
Join Date: Jul 2023
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello baghfay, all,
Can you or someone in this blog share the Ergun equation as Excel file ? Need to calculate the pressure loss across a clean bed media filter using different media and media heights such as sand or sand + anthracite. Thanks |
|
Tags |
ergun equation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
validation with Ergun equation | mhs | FLUENT | 3 | October 8, 2016 13:11 |
the result of the velocity and pressure drop is a little strange. | yuhehuan | FLUENT | 0 | December 18, 2012 20:48 |
gas-liquid upflow and downflow in packed bed ,the Ergun pressure drop is same? | W7032654 | FLUENT | 0 | March 11, 2011 22:26 |
Ergun pressure drop | Istadi | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 21, 2000 00:28 |