|
[Sponsors] |
Modelling Sand Retention Screen - Results Differing from Literature |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 10, 2020, 10:49 |
Modelling Sand Retention Screen - Results Differing from Literature
|
#1 |
New Member
Stuart
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7 |
Hello,
I am currently working on my dissertation investigating the performance of a mesh screen to retain sand. Currently I am attempting to recreate the results I have found in a research paper, however, despite replicating the input parameters the results are differing. The images below show the difference in results. The academic paper show the accumulation of particles at the screen, whereas all the particles pass through the screen during my simulation. Academic Paper Result ("Evaluation of sand screen performance using a discrete element model") My Results The first image shows the particles before they reach the screen. The second image shows that the majority of particles pass through the screen apart from the layer of particles which rests on the screen itself Setup Parameters I am running a fully transient simulation. I have enabled the discrete phase, continuous phase interaction, and the DEM collision model. The following parameters were also used. Particle Density - 2500 kg/m^3 Particle Youngs Modulus - 1e8 Nm^-2 Particle Diameter = 100e-6 m Screen slot width = 250e-6 m Time step = 1e-5s Liquid velocity = 0 m/s Sliding friction coefficient = 0.3 Poisson ratio = 0.25 Any help with explaining why the sand is not retained by the screen or tips on setting up the model will be much appreciated Thank You, Stuart Last edited by stuey05; January 10, 2020 at 10:52. Reason: Added images |
|
Tags |
dem, discrete, dpm, filter, sand |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Domain Reference Pressure and mass flow inlet boundary | AdidaKK | CFX | 75 | August 20, 2018 06:37 |
CFD in Naval Hydrodynamics, Off-Shore and Wave Modelling with OpenFOAM | hjasak | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 2 | February 13, 2017 05:59 |
Problems with Turbulence Modelling: conflicting results when using y+>=300 | Tehseen | FLUENT | 0 | March 18, 2016 12:35 |
Combustion modelling results accuracies | Les | Main CFD Forum | 7 | June 1, 2011 09:55 |
Modelling a screen in Fluent | Sushilkumar | FLUENT | 1 | April 15, 2009 13:03 |