CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

what is the meaning of giving a fixed temperature to the wall

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 16, 2019, 14:51
Default what is the meaning of giving a fixed temperature to the wall
  #1
Senior Member
 
Weiqiang Liu
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 9
Weiqiang Liu is on a distinguished road
hi all,

I am doing a micro-channel catalytic methane combustion simulation with fluent. after trying many methods recommended by literature, I failed to ignite the mixture, namely the simulation results are like cold flow.

somebody told me to remove the solid computation domain and give a fixed high temperature to the catalytic wall in order to ignite the mixture.

what confuses me is what is the meaning of giving a fixed temperature to the wall. The wall temperature is supposed to be computed by CFD calculation. How can I know the wall temperature in advance. What if the calculated temperature is not the same with the pre-defined wall temperature.

I am a new learner of CFD. Can anybody give me some help?

thanks

weiqiang.
Weiqiang Liu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2019, 17:10
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
In addition to mass transport and momentum transport equation, there is an energy transport equation. Let's suppose you take temperature as the transport variable (instead of internal energy, or enthalpy, or something else). Then you need to provide boundary conditions for temperature.

The canonical boundary conditions are: fixed temperature, fixed gradient (specified heat flux). So yes you can specify and should specify a wall temperature or a wall heat flux. When you specify a heat flux then you can say the temperature is calculated from the solution. But fixing the wall temperature is an even more canonical way to solve the pde (a fixed wall temperature constraint is a stronger constraint than fixing the heat flux).



When you simulate a coupled fluid and solid domain, you are coupling the temperature/gradient boundary condition of the fluid domain with the solid domain. That is, you say my wall temperature of the fluid is the same as the solid or you say the heat flux of the fluid is the same as the heat flux of the solid.

Removing the solid domain is a good idea since you are having trouble. Simplify your model and figure out why you cannot get sustained reactions.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 16, 2019, 22:59
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Weiqiang Liu
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 9
Weiqiang Liu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
In addition to mass transport and momentum transport equation, there is an energy transport equation. Let's suppose you take temperature as the transport variable (instead of internal energy, or enthalpy, or something else). Then you need to provide boundary conditions for temperature.

The canonical boundary conditions are: fixed temperature, fixed gradient (specified heat flux). So yes you can specify and should specify a wall temperature or a wall heat flux. When you specify a heat flux then you can say the temperature is calculated from the solution. But fixing the wall temperature is an even more canonical way to solve the pde (a fixed wall temperature constraint is a stronger constraint than fixing the heat flux).



When you simulate a coupled fluid and solid domain, you are coupling the temperature/gradient boundary condition of the fluid domain with the solid domain. That is, you say my wall temperature of the fluid is the same as the solid or you say the heat flux of the fluid is the same as the heat flux of the solid.

Removing the solid domain is a good idea since you are having trouble. Simplify your model and figure out why you cannot get sustained reactions.
yes, I boundary temperature or heat flux is necessary for solving pde. what confuses me is how can I know the appropriate boundary temperature. obviously, different boundary temperature would yield different results. am I right?
Weiqiang Liu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2019, 07:17
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Yes I think your friend is trying to help you get an ignited solution. Since you say cold stuff just flows out, setting the walls to high temperature might help keep it hot enough to stay ignited. Maybe after you get an ignited mixture with slightly different BC's, then you can try to change it back.

You are in debugging stage. Don't complain that this isn't the setting that you want. Because right now, with the settings that you want, your results are garbage. You already ran 200 000 iterations with the correct boundary conditions and got the wrong result.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2019, 11:14
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Weiqiang Liu
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 278
Rep Power: 9
Weiqiang Liu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyTran View Post
Yes I think your friend is trying to help you get an ignited solution. Since you say cold stuff just flows out, setting the walls to high temperature might help keep it hot enough to stay ignited. Maybe after you get an ignited mixture with slightly different BC's, then you can try to change it back.

You are in debugging stage. Don't complain that this isn't the setting that you want. Because right now, with the settings that you want, your results are garbage. You already ran 200 000 iterations with the correct boundary conditions and got the wrong result.
yes, I get it. Thanks for your patience
Weiqiang Liu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
catalytic combustion, fixed wall temperature, ignition


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Commercial meshers] Fluent3DMeshToFoam simvun OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 50 January 19, 2020 16:33
Shadow Wall and temperature norger FLUENT 10 September 28, 2019 12:43
Fixed Wall Temperature Pipe With Odd Results khoopes CFX 5 June 15, 2015 08:58
Wall BC: fixed Temperature Distribution camoesas OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 February 6, 2012 06:19
Question about bcdefw.f for wall temperature bc. Jimmy Siemens 10 March 18, 2008 16:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:08.