|
[Sponsors] |
September 23, 2018, 01:25 |
Simple vs Coupled which is best for airfoil
|
#1 |
New Member
harsha vardhan
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
hello all,
I'm trying to simulate airfoil. I'm using pressure-based solver. the question is does using simple or simplec method can change the result from the result we get from using coupled solver. and if i use coupled solver there is an divergence detected error which i'm not facing using simple at higher angle of attacks. Thankyou, waiting for your answers |
|
September 23, 2018, 01:31 |
|
#2 |
Member
subhankar das
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 8 |
In my simulation of open channel flow, I'm also facing the same problem. For simple or simplec it is converging but for coupled solver it not converged yet. I will suggest you use piso. I heard that piso gives stable solution.
|
|
September 24, 2018, 17:26 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
They should all give very similar results if the solution is converging.
You have to tinker and play with a lot of numerical settings. The default settings do not guarantee convergence for all possible problems in the universe. Of course the quality of your initial guess also influences things. My recommendation, use whatever works. |
|
Tags |
coupled, simple |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simple question : Simple Vs Coupled solver | Maria Angela | FLUENT | 5 | March 6, 2020 16:38 |
Reasons for decoupling the pressure and velocity computations | highlando | Main CFD Forum | 36 | April 10, 2017 11:41 |
Fluent vs Coupled analysis | vindiggity | FLUENT | 0 | October 29, 2016 15:09 |
SIMPLE vs. PISO | Kappa | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 17, 2016 09:08 |
Coupled analysis | Rosco | FLUENT | 2 | January 13, 2003 06:27 |