|
[Sponsors] |
Pressure drop in translationally periodic flow? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 26, 2018, 23:59 |
Pressure drop in translationally periodic flow?
|
#1 |
New Member
Dev Fons
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 |
So I was simulating laminar flow in a 2-D wavy channel but I get 0 pressure drop between the translational boundary conditions. I calculated the pressure at the inlet and the outlet and found the difference and divided it by the length but I get meaningless results which I suspect to be incorrect. In addition I computed it alternatively by using the wall shear stress but I get meaningless results too. What should I do?
Does this also mean that my pressure data is invalid? Can I instead calculate the pressure a distance after the inlet and a distance before the outlet to calculate the pressure drop? |
|
April 27, 2018, 05:36 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66 |
Are you using the target mass flow rate option? If not, the pressure gradient is an input, not an output.
|
|
April 27, 2018, 23:28 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Dev Fons
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Flu...ug/node390.htm I found this source which says it can be used as an output as well. However when I go to the surface integrals calculator and find dP-dx at the inlet it does give me a negative result which makes sense. Do you think it makes sense to use this value or is it an artefact of the simulation? does dP-dx at the inlet represent the entire flow? |
||
April 28, 2018, 00:33 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66 |
The pressure gradient you find in the periodic conditions box is the one you want, which is the body force term & represent the force driving the flow through your periodic section. I.e. this one is the one that you use to calculate the friction factor.
The dp-dx at the inlet is literally the pressure gradient only at the inlet, which tells you the pressure forces at that plane and not much else. Heck in 1D thermo analysis, you often assume this dp-dx to be 0. |
|
April 28, 2018, 19:51 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Dev Fons
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 |
Thank you for your reply LuckyTran. I still 0 on the periodic box even after update.. What am I doing wrong do you think?
|
|
April 30, 2018, 14:56 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,751
Rep Power: 66 |
So when you click update, it stays 0? If its always 0, then it's bugged.
Are you using v18.2? I just recently learned that in a particular version of Fluent, this is a known bug. But only in that one version. See post #8 in that thread. Strangely I have not yet encountered the same bug in 18.2. Unfortunately if it is bugged then you can't get your pressure drop and need to do it manually using probes of some sort or re-run it in a different version. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Wind tunnel Boundary Conditions in Fluent | metmet | FLUENT | 6 | October 30, 2019 13:23 |
Advice needed - laplacian pressure drop in gas-liquid flow | Simsey | CFX | 3 | August 20, 2017 19:37 |
Modelling the two-phase flow Pressure Drop in a helical coil | Lancashire | Fluent Multiphase | 4 | August 12, 2015 05:49 |
Periodic boundaries and pressure drop | MatejK | CFX | 2 | July 12, 2005 05:47 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 06:13 |