|
[Sponsors] |
March 2, 2018, 18:31 |
Fluent Pre exponential factor units
|
#1 |
New Member
Ed
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8 |
I am modeling the reduction of iron ore particle with hydrogen at high temperature
Fe3O4 + 4H2 = 3Fe + 4H2O I have the gas, particles and temperature working in my model. I am trying to get the chemical reaction working. The formula that agrees bets with test data is (-LN(1-X)) =8.65x10^6 x exp(-193,000,000/RT) x [pH2 - (pH2O/K)] x t or instantaneous dX/dt = 8.65x10^6 x exp(-193,000,000/RT) x [pH2 - (pH2O/K)] x (1-X) p is atm t is seconds for a given case [pH2 - (pH2O/K)] = .18 - when I get this case working I'll work towards a UDF Activation energy = 193,000,000 J/kgmol Can someone tell me how to convert the pre-exponential factor to the proper units? It appears to currently be (atm second)^-1 and Fluent wants kg/(m^3 s) (or mol/(m^3 s)?) When I hunt and peck the pre-exponential factor that works in Fluent is between .3 and 1 but I haven't found a unit conversion that comes anywhere close to that number. |
|
March 6, 2018, 05:51 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Ed_PA,
Please could you be specific about which reaction model you are using? For example, is it the Kinetic/Diffusion Surface Reaction Rate Model of combusting DPM particles? or Multiple Surface Reactions? What DPM injection type? -- combusting? multicomponent? Also, it is worth thinking ahead to what type of UDF you might want to develop. (The answer might be that the only way available is to take complete control via DEFINE_DPM_LAW, and the conclusion might be that this is not worth the effort, so then your thinking has to be directed to how to set up multiple reactions to achieve what you want.) Ed |
|
March 6, 2018, 09:26 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Ed
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 8 |
We are using multiple surface reactions, surface injection and multi-component combustion
|
|
March 7, 2018, 12:24 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 246
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi Ed_PA,
OK, I've forgotten which model is which, and I'm afraid I don't have time to chase this for you. One of the troubles is that I cannot remember a particle surface reaction that is given a simple Arrhenius rate with a pre-exponential factor and an activation energy. I *do* remember chasing the rather obscure "diffusion rate constant", which appears in the Theory Guide as symbol C1,r. There are quite a lot of unexplained assumptions packed into that constant, including an assumption that the temperature dependence of the gas reactant's diffusivity is (F*T^1.75), known as Fuller's Law. In case this is not relevant, I'll save myself the trouble of typing it all. If you have access to the ANSYS Customer Portal, look for solution 2037866. Can anyone else help? Good luck! Ed |
|
Tags |
pre-exponential factor |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX vs. FLUENT | turbo | CFX | 4 | April 13, 2021 09:08 |
How to solve UDF compilation problems in Fluent. | pakk | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 16 | September 10, 2018 03:48 |
Two questions on Fluent UDF | Steven | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 7 | March 23, 2018 04:22 |
heat transfer with RANS wall function, over a flat plate (validation with fluent) | bruce | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | January 20, 2017 07:22 |
Problems in lauching FLUENT | Lourival | FLUENT | 3 | January 16, 2008 17:48 |