CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

VoF, Width of interface between immiscible fluids, how to define sharp interface?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 4, 2017, 08:20
Default VoF, Width of interface between immiscible fluids, how to define sharp interface?
  #1
New Member
 
Yu Lu
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: England
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11
yulu is on a distinguished road
Hi all

I am simulating a not-too-complex problem with Fluent VoF model. The interface needs to be reasonably sharp because I'm focusing on interfacial phenomena. Because of this, I was planning to use the "width of the interface" or the idea of "how sharp the interface is" as the parameter for my mesh independence study. However I did not seem to find an accurate way to estimate/measure exactly the width of interface from the volume fraction contour. Obviously the more colour levels you use the more difficult to identify where exactly is defined as "interface". Attached figures are two situations where different volume fraction colour levels are used (10 levels vs 50 levels).


Similarly because of the colour level used, I also cannot know how many cells of meshing is occupied as the "interface".

But using denser mesh definitely makes the interface (identical view, same colour levels, same everything except mesh density) looks narrower (or sharper).

Is there any way to do this quantitatively properly?

Thank you very much!
Attached Images
File Type: png 10levels.PNG (14.0 KB, 21 views)
File Type: png 50levels.PNG (23.7 KB, 16 views)
yulu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2017, 12:14
Question
  #2
New Member
 
Yu Lu
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: England
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 11
yulu is on a distinguished road
These two are the interface new using a coarse mesh and a finer mesh. The volume fraction contour is using the same number of colour levels (20). So this "width of interface" has definitely decreased. How could I properly measure this in a quantitative way???
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mesh 0.jpg (20.7 KB, 15 views)
File Type: jpg mesh3.jpg (23.0 KB, 31 views)
yulu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 19, 2017, 04:41
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Alex
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 8
EternalEnvy is on a distinguished road
Quantitatively, you can use the cells number to represent the interface width. You may apply to UDF, where you can loop all the cells, then judge the cell by its C_VOF value. Interface cells should have a VOF value between 0 and 1.
EternalEnvy is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? mpeppels CFX 11 August 22, 2019 08:30
Wrong flow in ratating domain problem Sanyo CFX 17 August 15, 2015 07:20
sinusoidal interface between two immiscible fluids Stéphane Champmartin FLUENT 1 January 8, 2007 02:09
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger Mark CFX 6 November 15, 2004 16:55
Replace periodic by inlet-outlet pair lego CFX 3 November 5, 2002 21:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:08.