|
[Sponsors] |
July 26, 2017, 13:09 |
additional unsteady term in URANS
|
#1 |
New Member
Prasun Dutta
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
I have gone through several research papers and books about Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) studies and what I understand that in URANS, a time solution of the conventional RANS is performed for 3D unsteady problems, with or without special treatment for the flow instability. The equations of URANS are similar to the RANS models but include the additional unsteady term. I am using transient k-epsilon (in fluent) model but I am not sure where this extra term was included. I searched in fluent manual and it's still not clear to me. What are the differences in equations (governing / transport equations) when I use transient k-epsilon instead of steady k-epsilon model? Thnks in adv... |
|
July 28, 2017, 11:31 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
It's just what you wrote, an additional unsteady term is added, one for each equation you are solving (momentum and turbulence variables), and it is treated just like discussed in the manual (solver theory chapter). Basically, for each cell-equation, such addition implies an explicit part which goes on the RHS of the equations solved by Fluent, and an implicit part which goes on the LHS (affecting the matrix diagonal).
|
|
Tags |
k-epsilon model, urans |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problem of SOURCE term gradient in UDS | wind | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 6 | December 1, 2022 15:21 |
momentum source term | zwdi | FLUENT | 14 | June 27, 2017 16:40 |
Adding additional complex source term to BuoyantBoussinesqPisoFoam solver | pajofego | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | April 9, 2013 18:00 |
Difference between URANS and unsteady RANS | LD696 | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 3, 2010 12:13 |
URANS for unsteady flow? | thecfduser | Main CFD Forum | 4 | December 12, 2009 17:12 |