|
[Sponsors] |
July 3, 2017, 23:33 |
Initialization methodology
|
#1 |
New Member
Ken
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi there
I cant seem to find an appropriate solution to my problem on this forum so I have decided to post a new thread about this. I am working on a supersonic flow from a nozzle into an ambient control volume. But what happened is whenever I used standard initilization computed from the nozzle inlet, divergence will occur instantly and I cant run. However, when I used hybrid initialization, the solver managed to run. So what is the difference between the 2 kinds of initilization? Not in terms of its mechanism (kind of read about how these 2 initilizations work from the manuals) but in terms of its outcome/ robustness/ accuracy? Cos I was told that standard initilization would be a better option than hybrid. |
|
Tags |
fluent, hybrid initialization, initialization, initilisation, standard initialization |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FMG initialization query | Mohsin | FLUENT | 6 | November 2, 2016 03:02 |
CFX Transient Initialization | frossi | CFX | 1 | June 17, 2016 10:31 |
Solution initialization method in ANSYS Fluent | malick | FLUENT | 0 | June 15, 2016 01:52 |
Full Multigrid Initialization | Mr.Goodcat | FLUENT | 0 | March 17, 2016 07:43 |
compressor initialization | paglia | FLUENT | 0 | February 1, 2006 16:14 |