|
[Sponsors] |
How does CFL number and wall roughness affect the solution? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 22, 2017, 08:04 |
How does CFL number and wall roughness affect the solution?
|
#1 |
New Member
Prem Sagar
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
I'm simulating a compressible flow in a diverging duct. With a CFL number of 10, the shock keeps moving upstream of the duct with more iterations. But it never stops! It moves way upstream as compared to my experimental values. The residual plots almost saturate at some point as the shock is moving. So is it admissible to stop my iterations once the shock reaches the experimental location?
(Having played around with the CFL number, I observed that it took forever for the shock to move upstream to the required location for CFL=5) At some point I figured may be the wall roughness had a role to play, but after trying different values for wall roughness the shock still moved upstream. Im using the SST model, implicit scheme, AUSM flux splitting Any suggestions would be appreciated |
|
Tags |
cfl number, compressible flow, shock wave, wall roughness |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] Can't Shake Erros: patch type 'patch' not constraint type 'empty' | BrendaEM | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | April 3, 2022 19:32 |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
Cluster ID's not contiguous in compute-nodes domain. ??? | Shogan | FLUENT | 1 | May 28, 2014 16:03 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 10:01 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |