|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Alexander
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 38
Rep Power: 15 ![]() |
Hi,
I am running a DPM erosion case in Fluent on 128 cores on a Linux cluster. The problem description is as follows: · The maximum number of steps set for the Lagrangian tracking was set to a very high (conservative) value of 20000. This apparently created some accumulation of data inside Fluent, as if the software retained information on sand particles that escaped the domain a long time ago (most are exiting after 1500 time steps, the oldest live up to 5000 steps). Lowering this value to 2500 “cured” the problem. Has anybody else experienced this problem before? Any help would be appreciated ![]() Thanks |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problem of running parallel Fluent on linux cluster | ivanbuz | FLUENT | 15 | September 23, 2017 19:12 |
Porous media setup issues in Fluent | Bernard Van | FLUENT | 29 | January 26, 2017 04:09 |
how to use -ssh w/ Fluent on Linux cluster | Bill | FLUENT | 4 | April 2, 2014 00:04 |
Fluent MPI process doesn't end in cluster | martins | ANSYS | 0 | November 5, 2013 04:18 |
Performance of fluent on win200 and linux | Seb | FLUENT | 7 | February 5, 2004 15:08 |