|
[Sponsors] |
October 25, 2016, 12:26 |
Mass flow rate in 3D to 2D
|
#1 |
New Member
Taeyoung Kim
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello,
Like title, I am writing to get some advice to get mass flow rate in 2D. As I searched, I found below.. mass flow rate in 2D = mass flow rate in 3D/surface area * 1m * L (L : inlet edge length) But I have got wrong and different result comparing to 3D case. Would you share your solution and experience? Thank you |
|
October 25, 2016, 13:36 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi, check if your reference value for the depth is set to something different than 1m. That is the quantity fluent uses for the missing dimension.
However, I guess you wouldn't expect the flow rate to be as in a 3D case, or how far off are you? Cheers, M. |
|
October 26, 2016, 00:24 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Taeyoung Kim
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 13 |
Thank you for your valuable answer, M.
The reference value of depth is 1m. In 3D case, flow movement is verified by experimental result. Although there is no issue on this simulation, I need to model many cases with 2D case. I do not know why but.. I calculated velocity from mass flow rate and inlet area, and imposed velocity inlet. But the result was also different. This case is incompressible, so the result should be same, I guess. By the way, I will check inlet area,mass flow rate and volume flow rate through surface integral. Thank you. Young. |
|
Tags |
mass flow rate |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Higher mass flow rate at outlets as compare to inlet | Ahmed Saieed | FLUENT | 0 | April 4, 2016 00:08 |
trying to perform accurate mass flow rate sampling through hot-film probe | UTA_ARC | ANSYS | 0 | December 2, 2015 14:20 |
Calculating mass flow rate at multiphase flows | Kuslo187 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 1 | August 21, 2015 19:11 |
mass flow rate in DPM steady tracking | Roule | FLUENT | 4 | June 1, 2015 11:44 |
mass flow rate error | Masood | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2005 01:32 |