|
[Sponsors] |
October 13, 2016, 13:16 |
help to interpret result
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I'm trying to simulate the air inlet through a small hole. The domain is 3D. I made a meshing by parts, with small cells near the inlet. I have used double precision, and second order discretization. According to the data, the gas flow is incompressible, then I assume constant density. For the turbulence model, I am using the k-e realizable. In order to validate the mesh, I simulated for different meshes. In one of the attached figures, I plot the pressure drop vs. the number of elements in the mesh. When I saw that figure, I thought my mesh was validated. However, later I decided to adapt the validated mesh (velocity gradient), and got a pressure drop of about 200 Pa. I need help to interpret this result: my mesh is not validated? I appreciate the comments! |
|
October 14, 2016, 09:50 |
|
#2 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi, fist thing - are the sides of your domain supposed to be walls, or do you intend to simulate a free jet? I assume you considered domain-size independence? Just saying.. you definitely have interaction with your BC on the sides.
Telling from the number of elements, in my experience you should have reached a mesh-independent solution but that's vague.. Maybe it is more of a problem how you refined in your last step? what does your mesh look like before and after? -mo |
|
Tags |
adapt, mesh validation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange Result. | jwh107 | OpenFOAM | 10 | March 28, 2018 08:51 |
MRFSimpleFoam result checking | Aadhavan | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | December 8, 2012 05:52 |
How to display the whole result of a periodic model via one period result? | dixylo | FLUENT | 2 | February 23, 2012 05:11 |
Read Result Files or User Defined Result | Aquilaris | ANSYS | 0 | February 9, 2011 06:25 |
LES result | harrislcy | FLUENT | 1 | December 28, 2009 07:29 |