|
[Sponsors] |
August 30, 2016, 06:14 |
y+ range for turbulence models
|
#1 |
New Member
sime
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
Hello,in ansys fluent's dacuments it has been said that : (( ANSYS Fluent has taken steps to offer more advanced wall formulations, which
allow a consistent mesh refinement without a deterioration of the results. Such -independent formulations are the default for all omega-equation-based turbulence models. For the epsilon-equation-based models, the Menter-Lechner and Enhanced Wall Treatment (EWT) serve the same purpose. A -insensitive wall treatment is also the default for the Spalart-Allmaras model and allows you to run this model independent of the near-wall resolution. )) so, is it true that for models mentioned above like k-omega or k-epsilon(EWT,Menter-lechner)there is no need to check y+ value to be in a certain range ? for example can i use k-epsilon model with enhanced wall treatment and y+ value changes between 0.5 to 600 ? if my assumption is'nt true , what is the certain range of y+ value for all turbulence models like k-epsilon with wall functions or k-omega without wall functions ? please give me a reliable source ... thanks |
|
August 30, 2016, 18:39 |
|
#2 |
New Member
sime
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 10 |
anybody can't help me ?
|
|
Tags |
fluent, turbulence analysis, y plus |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
whats the cause of error? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | March 24, 2021 08:15 |
AMI memory leak? | MichiB | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 14 | August 1, 2015 19:18 |
Eddy Viscosity Models and Reynolds Stress Models | JuPa | CFX | 1 | August 20, 2013 19:56 |
is internalField(U) equivalent to zeroGradient? | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 29, 2013 02:27 |
Turbulence models for wide range of y+ | David Christopher | FLUENT | 2 | January 8, 2013 04:30 |