|
[Sponsors] |
Structured (Cutcell) vs Unstructured (tetrahedral) meshes difference in Fluent result |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 16, 2016, 13:44 |
Structured (Cutcell) vs Unstructured (tetrahedral) meshes difference in Fluent result
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 14 |
Hello Guys,
I am trying to investigate the difference in the results if I use structured (cutcell) mesh vs unstructured (tetrahedral) mesh in fluent. I am simulating hot airflow (60 m/s at 900 K) passing through a catalytic converter, and in cases that I compared using k-omega turbulence model the cutcell mesh produced double the TKE than the tetrahedral mesh in the flow expansion and contraction areas in the geometry. Anyone has ever compared two types of meshing techniques and would like to give any input? Thanks, Mike |
|
August 20, 2016, 21:30 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Daniel Riveros
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Genoa, Italy
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi Mike. I have done this type of comparison, I have got similar results. If you're sure you're using the same initial conditions, you must try to do a mesh independent analysis for each method. You can only compare your results when you get converged values. If you already did it, please tell us.
|
|
Tags |
fluent, turbulence |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How cell skew affects solution in structured vs unstructured grids | lordvon | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 3, 2013 07:19 |
Different result in CFX and fluent for mass trans.? is segregated better? | ftab | CFX | 7 | September 27, 2012 08:57 |
Difference between structured & unstructured mesh | Andrew | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 20, 2003 09:40 |
Large 3D tetrahedral meshes | Aldo Bonfiglioli | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 27, 1999 04:33 |
Unstructured CFD code; Difference ?? | J Roued | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 13, 1999 14:03 |