CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Translational Boundary Conditions along with Rotational Periodic Boundary Conditions

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 27, 2016, 15:25
Default Translational Boundary Conditions along with Rotational Periodic Boundary Conditions
  #1
New Member
 
ishan
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
bluemanboy is on a distinguished road
I have made an parametric finned tube CAD model in ANSYS Design Modeler. My goal is to study the pressure drop in the tube for different combination of number of fins, fin height and fin width. The internal fins have a certain helix angle and there are a number of fins. The tube has one inlet and one outlet. Since the fins are arranged in a helical pattern, a single helical strip of one helix pitch length is to be modeled. I can understand that a transnational periodic boundary condition can be applied between the inlet and outlet of one strip of the fin, but I am not sure as to how would the sides of the fin can be modeled. I have one reference where he applies rotational periodicity to the sides of that one single strip.I went ahead with the reference, but I got absolutely wrong results. The pressure drop was of the -10^4 order,which is not even close to the reference measurements. The residuals were close to 10^-6 for all the equations.I am using 4 mesh interfaces;2 for connecting inlet and outlet and 2 for connecting the side faces of the helical strip. I applied the periodic conditions through "Mesh Interfaces" option in Fluent,however I got a bit confused when a started to input the "mass flow rate" in periodic operating conditions.There was only periodic operating conditions input, so for which PBC I was entering the mass flow rate-rotation and translational ? The model being used is RANS SST k-omega. I also went through the "periodic repeats " option thinking that I have two periodic zones adjacent to each other, but it's usage was for something completely different. Also,since I have gone into a considerable detail, I also want to know whether it's possible to have mixed type boundary conditions ,for example, can I have translational and rotational boundary conditions on two faces of an hellical geometry, such as this pipe?
bluemanboy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 6, 2017, 02:30
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Shamoon Jamshed
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Karachi
Posts: 381
Rep Power: 18
Shamoon Jamshed is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to Shamoon Jamshed
Dear Bluemans

I hope you must be doing good. Exactly, exactly, I am also facing the same problem . I got two boundary conditions (in fact 4) two inlet and outlet and two rotational. Upon a number of posts sent on CFD-online I got now reply. So I just modled one strip with rot. periodic only and with whole pipe length. So i put velo.inlet and pr_outlet. Of cousre, this increased the mesh size a lot but I had no other option. Right now, my PC can handle upto 3.5 million successfully.

Have you come up with a solution for this yet?
Shamoon Jamshed is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
fluent, parameterization, periodic conditions


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with SIMPLEC-like finite volume channel flow boundary conditions ghobold Main CFD Forum 3 June 15, 2015 12:14
Periodic Boundary Conditions Persil FLUENT 12 December 10, 2013 12:38
Error finding variable "THERMX" sunilpatil CFX 8 April 26, 2013 08:00
Periodic boundary conditions for 2D pipe (water flow). thess FLUENT 3 May 31, 2012 14:38
Problem with periodic boundary conditions jm_ngs FLUENT 7 April 27, 2012 03:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:03.