Site Species

Diger · July 22, 2016, 18:07

So I defined Wall Surface reactions with some site species and set the site density to 3.58e-5 (kgmol/m2) (what does the prefix kg before the mol stand for anyway?). The site coverage is defined as 1.
Now I would presume this site coverage applies to ALL walls automatically, is that right?
But if that is so and I select a wall in contours of species -> surface coverage of <...> then it sets the range from 0 to 0 (I also see visually that theres apparently no site coverage with my site species) speaking that there is no <...> site species, correct?
What did I forget here?

edit: sry error from my side

Diger · July 23, 2016, 10:33

Though it would be interesting to know, why the coverage is so patchy. I would have assumed homogenous distribution since I did not specify any pattern...

July 22, 2016, 18:07	Site Species	#1
Diger Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 135 Rep Power: 11	So I defined Wall Surface reactions with some site species and set the site density to 3.58e-5 (kgmol/m2) (what does the prefix kg before the mol stand for anyway?). The site coverage is defined as 1. Now I would presume this site coverage applies to ALL walls automatically, is that right? But if that is so and I select a wall in contours of species -> surface coverage of <...> then it sets the range from 0 to 0 (I also see visually that theres apparently no site coverage with my site species) speaking that there is no <...> site species, correct? What did I forget here? edit: sry error from my side Last edited by Diger; July 23, 2016 at 10:29.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Site Species	Diger	FLUENT	6	May 3, 2016 06:36
some questions about site species	jeniuswx	FLUENT	0	September 11, 2012 08:10
what meaning of site species?	major	FLUENT	3	June 1, 2010 11:46
Site versus solid species	Suzy	FLUENT	0	June 30, 2007 02:58
Selected Site Species	Grégory	FLUENT	0	March 22, 2006 08:58

July 23, 2016, 10:33		#2
Diger Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Posts: 135 Rep Power: 11	Though it would be interesting to know, why the coverage is so patchy. I would have assumed homogenous distribution since I did not specify any pattern...