|
[Sponsors] |
Natural convection with or without turbulence model |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 30, 2016, 04:26 |
Natural convection with or without turbulence model
|
#1 |
New Member
Christoph Ferk
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi everybody,
Im conducting some simple natural convection simulations: I am simulating a vertical channel 3,2m in height and 0,4m in width. Both sides have a fixed temperature of 313K and the air inlet temperature is 293K. density variation of air with respect to the temperature was modelled with the boussinesq approximation. Hence the Ra-Number is about 5e10 which indicates turbulent flow. Therfore I implemented the k-e RNG turbulence model and refined the grid in the near wall region (highest y+ value is about 1,3). But the solution seems not reasoable for me. I expected the velocity to be zero in adequate distance to the wall, also the thermal boundary layer is pretty thick (see attachment). Calculated Nu-Numbers (Q*L)/(lambda*DetaT) are similar to analyticly calculated ones. So I am quite unsure what to think about this solution. If I conduct the same problme without Turbulence model, the temperature and velocity field seem more relieable to me. Any input would be highly appriciated. Regards Chris |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Only two turbulence options available in CFX Pre | Jack001 | CFX | 5 | March 30, 2016 03:47 |
Turbulence model for a natural circulation system | raveesh | FLUENT | 0 | September 23, 2014 04:11 |
Turbulence model for Natural circulation | raveesh | FLUENT | 0 | August 16, 2014 13:23 |
Boussinesq model for natural convection | dreamz | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 8, 2013 14:10 |
How model natural convection in water? | Fiska | FLUENT | 4 | January 28, 2010 04:23 |