|
[Sponsors] |
How are MRF and Mixing Plane 'time-averaged'? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 10, 2016, 12:17 |
How are MRF and Mixing Plane 'time-averaged'?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi. It's great to have a place to ask questions. Please forgive my lack of knowledge - I'm a newby!
In ANSYS Fluent, there is the Sliding Mesh model, which solves the fundamental equations for each time-step. The moving mesh zone (if we assume one moving zone and one stationary zone) then moves on with time, and at a new time step, another solution is calculated. This method is therefore unsteady, or 'time-accurate'. I understand the basic principle of MRF and Mixing Plane, but do not understand how these models are 'time-averaged'. Please could someone explain this? ((the MRF model is often described as a 'frozen rotor' model – a solution is only achieved for one orientation, and so it's like a 'snapshot' of the system. If it's a snapshot, how can it be time-averaged?)) Last edited by newby; May 10, 2016 at 12:22. Reason: additional query |
|
Tags |
mixing plane model, multiple reference frames, sliding mesh model |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problems with mixing plane | dowlee | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | September 21, 2016 01:14 |
Mixing Tank 3D MRF case | monty86 | FLUENT | 1 | October 9, 2015 04:43 |
mixing plane vs frozen rotor | feafan | STAR-CCM+ | 5 | August 25, 2014 07:14 |
Modelling mixing tank using MRF | Adi | FLUENT | 6 | November 4, 2009 01:28 |
difference in MRF and Mixing plane | sam | FLUENT | 0 | November 18, 2006 12:34 |