CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Gradually increasing the rotational speed in a moving ref frame problem

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 14, 2016, 06:42
Question Gradually increasing the rotational speed in a moving ref frame problem
  #1
New Member
 
Silvia S.
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
Mr.Goodcat is on a distinguished road
Goodmorning, everyone.

I'm a neophyte of Fluent and i need to simulate a flow case which requires the use of moving reference frames.

I'm using the pressure based coupled solver (steady state) with the SST k-w turbulence model and i'm trying to simulate the flow field for a helicopter rotor blade in hover.

Hoping to avoid convergence problems, i thought that for the first 150 (more or less) iterations i would use a first order upwind discretization, switch off the energy equation and use very low URF factor (as suggested in the manual).
Since that wasn't enough, following the suggestion of a tutorial i found online i'd like to try to gradually increase the rotational speed of the moving reference frame, instead of starting immediately with the 40rad/s of the reference case.

If anyone of you has ever used such methodology, could you please explain to me how to apply it? I mean:

- should i start with low rotational velocity and increase it gradually every (for example) 40 iterations KEEPING switched off energy equation/using first order upwind AND WHEN I REACH 40 RAD/S switch on the energy equation and change to second order ?

-OR should i "complete" the simulation (from first order/energy off to second order/energy on) for EVERY STEP of increased rotational speed?

Much obliged to anyone who might enlighten me...



-------Almost forgot:

I used the "final"rotational speed of 40rad/s when i estimated the wall distance needed to achieve a y+=1.
I don't need to modify the mesh for every step of speed, do i???

Last edited by Mr.Goodcat; March 14, 2016 at 06:55. Reason: information to add
Mr.Goodcat is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 14, 2016, 15:35
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
duri
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Rep Power: 17
duri is on a distinguished road
No need to turn on second order, energy etc for every rpm increment similarly no need to turn off either. I mean you can start with your final settings and look for convergence and decide based on that.
duri is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 15, 2016, 02:16
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,762
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
I would check the box, higher order term relaxation. This adds a urf for the second order terms so it behaves like 1st order until it stabilizes then gradually becomes closer to second order with each iteration. This saves you from having to manually switch on/off.

What equation of state are you using? If constant density where temperature plays no role then yes you can disable it until you reach your final speed. But if you are using something like ideal gas law I would always leave energy on because you want to gradually bring in the pressure and temperature dependence rather than a hard switch.

It sounds like you haven't done anything yet. These tricks are useful for avoiding convergence problems, you should run your simulation with default settings regardless. If it converges without any issues then great. Only when you actually have a problem should you start tinkering, otherwise you are just wasting time. Doing it this way also helps you learn when to expect convergence issues, the types of problems that lead to convergence issues, etc. If you always start a simulation with a super low urf then you'll never learn when problems arise.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 16, 2016, 07:31
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Silvia S.
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
Mr.Goodcat is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the pointers to both of you, duri and Lucky Tran. I'll put them immediately to use.

Also, Lucky Tran, I particularly appreciated your advice:
Quote:
Only when you actually have a problem should you start tinkering, otherwise you are just wasting time. Doing it this way also helps you learn when to expect convergence issues, the types of problems that lead to convergence issues, etc. If you always start a simulation with a super low urf then you'll never learn when problems arise
I do have a tendency to make my life harder than it has to be..

Ps: as a matter of fact I am making an ideal gas assumption (with constant viscosity).
Mr.Goodcat is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving reference frame in wind turbine kongl1986 FLUENT 0 March 30, 2013 11:50
moving mesh vs moving reference frame nikolaous FLUENT 0 August 1, 2012 19:46
Defining a moving rotational axis! Samuel CFX 3 September 12, 2007 11:00
problem faced in moving reference frame san FLUENT 0 March 18, 2006 09:58
Concept Behind Moving Reference Frame Lam Main CFD Forum 1 February 27, 2005 13:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:55.