|
[Sponsors] |
March 10, 2016, 06:35 |
time averaged mixture fraction
|
#1 |
Member
kai
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13 |
Dear ALL,
I have a question regarding the time averaged mixture fraction for non-premixed combustion. Before i start running my transient case, the mixture fraction option has been chosen under sampling options. However, after running for certain physical time, i have noticed there is no time averaged mixture fraction but only instantaneous mean mixture fraction available, under the option of unsteady statistics (contour plot). Has anyone ever met the same problem, i remember i have seen such questions in the forum before, but i can't find it. Regards, Kai. |
|
March 10, 2016, 08:58 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi Kai,
You can go for 2 approaches; under `run calculation' there is the option 'sample time statistics' that allows to set time averaged variables. I never use it, but I guess it would be available for mixture fractions, too. Another option is to export your data every N timesteps via calculation activities, and post-process in your favorite program. For example it's quite straightforward to average a large number of files in MATLAB. Does that answer your question? Cees |
|
March 12, 2016, 08:20 |
|
#3 |
Member
kai
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi cees,
Thanks for your help, but that's exactly my problem. Under sample statistics, although i have chosen the averaged mixture fraction, it is not really saved after calculation. The export of data does not have the time averaged mixture fraction either. (all other variables are time averaged properly, except for mixture fraction.) Kai. |
|
March 12, 2016, 08:57 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0 |
That is odd indeed; can you make monitor points or so for it or does it not show up under that tab either?
I guess the post-processing option would still be a possibility, but of course, a more tedious and time-taking one. |
|
March 14, 2016, 04:57 |
|
#5 |
Member
kai
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13 |
The option is not available anywhere, not even in post-processing....weird one.
|
|
March 14, 2016, 06:02 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Cees Haringa
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Delft
Posts: 607
Rep Power: 0 |
Is it possible for you to use MATLAB or so for post-processing? Then it is certainly possible.
|
|
March 15, 2016, 08:45 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Andrea
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 16 |
According to my experience when collecting statistics, for some reason the time-averaged quantities for some variables are not available under Unsteady Statistics until you save your .cas and .dat file. Try to save your results, close Fluent and open you results again and the mean-f variable should be there.
|
|
March 16, 2016, 09:11 |
|
#8 |
Member
kai
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13 |
Well, i did have saved my cas and data file as i run all my cases on cluster, and save the file every few time steps. None of those saved data include the mean variable i want.
But anyway, thanks for your help. Kai. |
|
March 17, 2016, 05:30 |
|
#9 |
Member
kai
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13 |
I think the mixture fraction data is not even saved for post-processing..so no point to use a different software to post-process.
Kai. |
|
March 17, 2016, 08:12 |
|
#10 |
Senior Member
Andrea
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Kai,
which Fluent version are you using? I am with Fluent 15.0 and I am having a strange issue when collecting statistics for the mixture fraction as well. Although f is supposed to be bounded between 0 and 1 (and the instantaneous values are indeed in the correct range), the mean mixture fraction goes well above 1, so I am guessing perhaps there is a bug in the averaging of this particular variable? I am trying to define a custom field function equal to f and see if the statistics for this function will look sensible, I'll keep you posted Andrea |
|
March 18, 2016, 08:21 |
|
#11 |
Member
kai
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 13 |
I am using 14.5, and i have never seen mean mixture fraction go above 1, though i can't find the averaged mixture fraction.
|
|
March 23, 2016, 07:36 |
|
#12 |
Senior Member
Andrea
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 16 |
Hi Kai,
It looks like I have solved my issues collecting statistic for the mixture fraction by defining a cff equal to the instantaneous mixture fraction value, and sampling this cff instead of the variable solved for in Fluent. I am attaching a few screenshots to show you what I meant (I have been collecting statistics only for a short time, this is why the time-averaged values look a bit wiggly). You can see that the instantaneous value is bounded between 0. As I mentioned in my previous post, the time-averaged value for Fluents variable is bounded between 0 and 9 (for some reason I am not able to explain) and the cff time-averaged value is bounded (correctly) between 0 and 1. Hope this can help to solve your issue as well Andrea |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] Contribution a new utility: refine wall layer mesh based on yPlus field | lakeat | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 58 | December 23, 2021 03:36 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
time step directories naming issue | Andrea_85 | OpenFOAM | 3 | April 3, 2014 09:38 |
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 10, 2013 10:34 |
On the damBreak4phaseFine cases | paean | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 14, 2008 22:14 |