|
[Sponsors] |
Low-re k-epsilon : launder sharma. Exact form in fluent? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 25, 2016, 01:20 |
Low-re k-epsilon : launder sharma. Exact form in fluent?
|
#1 |
New Member
codenamenone
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello all,
I am attempting to verify a results from nasa using fluent. Attempts with standard k-epsilon, SA, SST were fruitless up until now. It seems to me that all the models I have used use a wall function which may not be applicable for my case. (Or I think wall function is the problem because I have literally transformed k epsilon transport eq in fluent to the exact same form used in the nasa program using udf) But anyways, so right now I am attempting to just run a low re ke model (launder sharma) which does not use any wall function. I want to modify this lowreke transport too to match the nasa model( not sure how yet). But I just cannot find what transport equation is embedded in fluent. Does anyone know what the exact form of the lowreke( launder sharma) is in fluent? Also, if anyone knows how to turn off a wall function in the standard ke, please let me know. Thanks! HJ |
|
February 25, 2016, 02:56 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Ashwani
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 154
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
You can try to make your mesh such that y-plus is less than 2. And try to use the either standard or Enhanced wall treatment (mostly it will be better). If you see fluent manual you will find that there is a switch to non-wall function implementation when y plus value falls below certain range. http://aerojet.engr.ucdavis.edu/flue...ug/node512.htm Please share you experience, on how did you handled this problem. |
|
Tags |
low re k-e, udf and programming, wall functions |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low Reynolds K Epsilon Launder Sharma Model Functions Doubt... | Ruonin | Main CFD Forum | 17 | February 17, 2014 10:52 |
Is Fluent valid for low Re condition? | REACTION | FLUENT | 10 | February 6, 2005 07:40 |
FLUENT for low pressure case | Jim | FLUENT | 1 | March 30, 2004 13:11 |
Diemsionless form in Fluent | Salhi Rachid | FLUENT | 1 | June 17, 2003 07:19 |
Free form surface in fluent, two ways? | Rajil Saraswat | FLUENT | 0 | June 13, 2003 17:36 |