|
[Sponsors] |
February 22, 2016, 13:47 |
FLow past cylinder. Mesh independency test
|
#1 |
New Member
Beata Czapla
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I’m trying to do grid independence test of flow past cylinder using Ansys Fluent 17.0. I carried out calculation for several meshes (from 134 993 to 395 098), But i still don’t get coverage of results. The flow is 2D, so I think the numer of 395 098 elements is really high. And I should get coverage of results for mesh with less numer of elements. I know that I do sth wrong, but I don’t know what. Could you help me ? I’m beginner in CFD. I present the conditions of the test below. Conditions of the test: • Diameter of cylinder is 20mm; Domain size 900mmx300mm. • Simulation type 2D • Unsteady flow • Turbulent model: k-omega SST • Water as a fluid • Reynolds numer: 19 904 • Boundary conditions: o Inlet: Velocity inlet: 1m/s, turbulent intensivity 5%, Hydraulic Diameter 0,3m o Outlet as outflow o Top and bottom walls and cylinder : non slip walls • Y+ =(0,2 -10) • Time step: 0,0001s, Number of time steps: 100000 Below, I attached my results and image of my mesh Thank you Beata |
|
February 23, 2016, 08:20 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 13 |
how do you know your results are not converged?
|
|
February 23, 2016, 08:35 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Beata Czapla
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
because cd and cl, and pressure aren't the same for each mesh
I attached my results in table below: |
|
February 24, 2016, 18:42 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 13 |
mesh independence testing is not the same as convergence of a simulation.
and mesh independence testing does not mean that the two meshes will have exact 0.0000001 and 0.0000001 cd or cl etc. when you go from 1 million cells to 2 million and get a cd of 0.5 in the first and 0.7 in the second, then you can make a mesh with 3 million cells but if the cd goes to 0.72 now and for a 4 million cell mesh 0.74, you have to stick to the 2 million cell mesh, since the improvement you are getting is small compared to the double resources and computer power you are using. Unless ofcourse you are in NASA and sending a space shuttle to pluto, then you can worry about the small difference. |
|
March 3, 2016, 14:10 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Pradip
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 10 |
hi beattacz
may i know y did u use K omega sst model??? |
|
March 4, 2016, 13:06 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Beata Czapla
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10 |
yes I dod use, k-w SST model
|
|
April 26, 2020, 16:44 |
You mean the mesh in this cases has been completed, but you see the average pressure
|
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 388
Rep Power: 9 |
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
flow past cylinder, mesh independency |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flow past a cylinder, Reynolds No: 100, Tracking strouhal Number. | Karan | FLUENT | 11 | November 14, 2016 05:49 |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
Flow past a circular cylinder mesh | Turbulent | Main CFD Forum | 8 | December 9, 2012 05:19 |
Incorrect Drag and Drag Coefficient for flow over a cylinder | ozzythewise | Main CFD Forum | 8 | June 13, 2012 07:24 |
incompressible free surface flow past cylinder | vineet | FLUENT | 2 | April 1, 2002 06:56 |