CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

FLow past cylinder. Mesh independency test

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 22, 2016, 13:47
Default FLow past cylinder. Mesh independency test
  #1
New Member
 
Beata Czapla
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
beattacz is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I’m trying to do grid independence test of flow past cylinder using Ansys Fluent 17.0. I carried out calculation for several meshes (from 134 993 to 395 098), But i still don’t get coverage of results. The flow is 2D, so I think the numer of 395 098 elements is really high. And I should get coverage of results for mesh with less numer of elements. I know that I do sth wrong, but I don’t know what. Could you help me ? I’m beginner in CFD. I present the conditions of the test below.

Conditions of the test:
• Diameter of cylinder is 20mm; Domain size 900mmx300mm.
• Simulation type 2D
• Unsteady flow
• Turbulent model: k-omega SST
• Water as a fluid
• Reynolds numer: 19 904
• Boundary conditions:
o Inlet: Velocity inlet: 1m/s, turbulent intensivity 5%, Hydraulic Diameter 0,3m
o Outlet as outflow
o Top and bottom walls and cylinder : non slip walls
• Y+ =(0,2 -10)
• Time step: 0,0001s, Number of time steps: 100000

Below, I attached my results and image of my mesh

Thank you
Beata
Attached Images
File Type: png results.png (21.9 KB, 24 views)
File Type: png mesh.png (31.3 KB, 30 views)
beattacz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2016, 08:20
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 13
hwet is on a distinguished road
how do you know your results are not converged?
hwet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 23, 2016, 08:35
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Beata Czapla
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
beattacz is on a distinguished road
because cd and cl, and pressure aren't the same for each mesh
I attached my results in table below:
Attached Images
File Type: png results.png (21.9 KB, 26 views)
beattacz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 24, 2016, 18:42
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 375
Rep Power: 13
hwet is on a distinguished road
mesh independence testing is not the same as convergence of a simulation.

and mesh independence testing does not mean that the two meshes will have exact 0.0000001 and 0.0000001 cd or cl etc.

when you go from 1 million cells to 2 million and get a cd of 0.5 in the first and 0.7 in the second, then you can make a mesh with 3 million cells but if the cd goes to 0.72 now and for a 4 million cell mesh 0.74, you have to stick to the 2 million cell mesh, since the improvement you are getting is small compared to the double resources and computer power you are using.

Unless ofcourse you are in NASA and sending a space shuttle to pluto, then you can worry about the small difference.
hwet is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 3, 2016, 14:10
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Pradip
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 10
pradip.c1000 is on a distinguished road
hi beattacz
may i know y did u use K omega sst model???
pradip.c1000 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 4, 2016, 13:06
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Beata Czapla
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
beattacz is on a distinguished road
yes I dod use, k-w SST model
beattacz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 26, 2020, 16:44
Default You mean the mesh in this cases has been completed, but you see the average pressure
  #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 388
Rep Power: 9
hitzhwan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by hwet View Post
mesh independence testing is not the same as convergence of a simulation.

and mesh independence testing does not mean that the two meshes will have exact 0.0000001 and 0.0000001 cd or cl etc.

when you go from 1 million cells to 2 million and get a cd of 0.5 in the first and 0.7 in the second, then you can make a mesh with 3 million cells but if the cd goes to 0.72 now and for a 4 million cell mesh 0.74, you have to stick to the 2 million cell mesh, since the improvement you are getting is small compared to the double resources and computer power you are using.

Unless ofcourse you are in NASA and sending a space shuttle to pluto, then you can worry about the small difference.
You mean the mesh in this cases has been completed, but you see the average pressure of cylinder, it has changed a lot for the mesh models, why?
hitzhwan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
flow past cylinder, mesh independency


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow past a cylinder, Reynolds No: 100, Tracking strouhal Number. Karan FLUENT 11 November 14, 2016 05:49
Moving mesh Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 122 June 15, 2014 07:20
Flow past a circular cylinder mesh Turbulent Main CFD Forum 8 December 9, 2012 05:19
Incorrect Drag and Drag Coefficient for flow over a cylinder ozzythewise Main CFD Forum 8 June 13, 2012 07:24
incompressible free surface flow past cylinder vineet FLUENT 2 April 1, 2002 06:56


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:45.