|
[Sponsors] |
Is Fluent better for multiphase mixture modelling than CFX? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 2, 2016, 14:23 |
Is Fluent better for multiphase mixture modelling than CFX?
|
#1 |
New Member
Timur
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear all,
If I want to simulate the water dominant flow with oil bubbles in an inclined pipe, I would think of goint to do it Fluent with Mxiture model to accont slip or use Eulerian model for more general purposes. Hovewer, I saw some articles which describe such works done in CFX. But everywhere I keep reading that Fluent is better for multiphase flow usage however the reasons are not provided. Could you please share you opinion about general difference in multiphase modelling between Fuent and CFX and what is more appreciated, which model is better to use for the water dominant flow with oil bubbles in an inclined pipe? Any ideas are appreciated. Thank you very much in advance. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX overwhelming Fluent in mass convergence of boundary layer separation case | Pierre1 | FLUENT | 7 | March 26, 2015 22:43 |
Result comparision of CFX and fluent | sunxihui | CFX | 1 | September 24, 2012 21:42 |
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
Wall function formulation in CFX and Fluent | gravis | ANSYS | 0 | May 4, 2010 12:03 |
Reynolds Stress model in CFX vs Fluent | Tim | CFX | 1 | October 7, 2009 07:19 |