CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Ideas about Gas - Solid Cyclone Separator Simulations

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 11, 2016, 08:54
Default Ideas about Gas - Solid Cyclone Separator Simulations
  #1
New Member
 
uk
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14
ardismo is on a distinguished road
Hi;

Im trying to simulate gas-solid cyclone separator used in cement industry. I will mention about boundary conditions and operating conditions. I need some ideas to solve more accurate , quicker solution with same accuracy or to correct my mistakes. These will helpful for me and for others who has need help on this subject.

operating conditions ;

- It is a multilevel system consists of 5 cyclone levels.
- very high dust loading particle.( 0.2 kg particle/ m^3 air)
- 12 to 20 m/s inlet velocity
- nearly 700 m^3 control volume

Boundary Conditions;

1 - velocity inlet
2 - pressure outlet or outflow

****normally outlet is not open to atmosphere. Gas always goes to upper cyclone level. So there must not be reverse flow.

3 - wall ,of cyclone body
4 - wall of dust outlet

Setup settings;

1 - Mesh count : 160K , 700K , 3M, 8M , 30M
2 - Eularian multiphase model with dense DPM option.
3 - Reynols stress model with linear pressure strain option
4 - pressure-velocity coupling scheme;
----Simple : there is no need to set a CFL but long computational time.
----Coupled : I have enough memory. But in Fluent theory manual, it says below 10 is not recommended for Courant number. And if you can't choose wright CFL in coupled , solution monitors fluctuates a lot.
5 - Spatial Discretization ;
---- Gradient :Green Gauss node based
---- Pressure : Presto
---- others : second or third order upwind---- solution monitors fluctuates a lot. So it says you to switch time-dependent simulation.
6 - Under Relaxation Factors : 0.5 for all parameters
7 - Initialization : Normal + FMG with 7 levels


QUESTIONS

1 - I will use Multi-Objective algorithm to get functions of separation efficiency and pressure loss depending on geometric and flow parameters. I could not get efficiency directly . I use 17 injections for 17 different diameters, I need efficiency for all diameters like output parameters.

2 - Is it necessary to set a boundary layer mesh while using RSM ?

3 - Which model would be more suitable for particle drag force calculations ?

Thank you in advance
ardismo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 31, 2016, 03:43
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: China
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
chen_xmu is on a distinguished road
I am alos interested in cyclone separator simulation.
The reference below may help your problem.

[1] S.K. Shukla, P. Shukla, P. Ghosh, Evaluation of numerical schemes using different simulation methods for the continuous phase modeling of cyclone separators, Adv. Powder Technol. 22 (2011) 209–219. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2010.11.009.
chen_xmu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 31, 2016, 07:14
Default
  #3
New Member
 
uk
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 14
ardismo is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your response. But I can solve primary phase flow accurately. My main problem is to solve DPM physics. As I mentioned above I have 16 diameters that ı modeled as 16 injections. I want to see seperation efficiencies of each diameter.
ardismo is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 31, 2016, 08:26
Talking
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: China
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 10
chen_xmu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardismo View Post
Thank you so much for your response. But I can solve primary phase flow accurately. My main problem is to solve DPM physics. As I mentioned above I have 16 diameters that ı modeled as 16 injections. I want to see seperation efficiencies of each diameter.
This problem troubled me too. If you have solved , Please share the solution with me , Thanks.
chen_xmu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 6, 2016, 09:04
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Tal Eluk
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 11
Tal Eluk is on a distinguished road
Hi- here is my suggestion:
In case you are not reaching high levels of solid volume fraction (let's say below 10%) then you might be able to say that the particle don't affect each other. in that case there is no need to follow all the 17 injections at ones. you can run each diameter on it's own and get explicit efficiency for each one. this will require 17 DPM runs, but if you do it "one way" after the fluid is already converged you can be done with all 17 runs after 1/2 houre.

Good luck
Tal
Tal Eluk is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Setting the height of the stream in the free channel kevinmccartin CFX 12 October 13, 2022 22:43
Problem in setting Boundary Condition Madhatter92 CFX 12 January 12, 2016 05:39
Gas Cyclone convergence problem lxlylzl FLUENT 36 July 21, 2012 03:31
Yplus [y+] value for gas solid two phase flow P.R.Naren Main CFD Forum 0 September 5, 2006 03:04
Gas pressure question Dan Moskal Main CFD Forum 0 October 24, 2002 23:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:04.