|
[Sponsors] |
October 15, 2015, 11:47 |
3D Airfoil simualtion
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
I'm trying to simulate a 3D airfoil in fluent. I've done the meshing and have got 3 grids which I know will give me independency:
G1 - 636,000 elements G2 - 890,400 elements G3 - 1,272,000 elements Reynolds no. is 120,000 and for turbulence I must use k-omega SST. I use COUPLED for coupling press. and vel. and for Pressure I use PRESTO! , for momentum QUICK , Turb. kinetic energy and press. diss. rate also 2nd order up wind. it worked perfectly fine with around 270,000 elements. but the amount of Cl was not right and I needed to get mesh independency. I checked G1 but it diverges after 2 rounds. changed turb. kin. energy and press. diss. rate to QUICK but didn't change anything? Can anyone help me and tell me what the problem is? |
|
October 17, 2015, 19:53 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
Hey I'm trying to understand how to properly simulate an airfoil in Fluent too. Exactly what aspects are you observing, and what's the speed and altitude? What made you choose your simulation method? Why is your mesh separated, and what kind of mesh is it?
Thanks. |
|
October 18, 2015, 16:03 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 11 |
you should check Cl and Cd convergence other than residuals. for setting the speed you should set in boundary condition. I chose the method because of the relatively high Reynolds no. and also read it in a paper. my mesh is a C Grid. I don't' really get what you mean by why is the mesh separated.
for more details check the link below https://confluence.cornell.edu/displ...ver+an+Airfoil |
|
October 18, 2015, 20:51 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 11 |
As I'm quite new I can't really help you that much. What I can do is recommend the k epsilon model as it appears to be the most popular with the aerodynamics you're focusing on. The compressibility of your flow depends on what kind of flight you're looking at, if its subsonic consider incompressible. Convergence may be affected by your pressure velocity coupling (maybe PRESTO would be better?). If anyone has more experience in this they should jump in. Again, it'd be nice if you gave more detail as to what your target altitude and velocity are, as well as the characteristics you're identifying (flow on the wing, behind the wing, pressure, etc).
Last edited by Rarepepe; October 19, 2015 at 00:01. |
|
Tags |
airfoil, airfoil 3d, divergence, mesh independence, mesh independency |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SU2 AOA optimization | 454514566@qq.com | SU2 | 9 | March 7, 2022 17:17 |
Ffd_control_point_2d | feiyi | SU2 | 4 | September 30, 2019 13:42 |
2D FFD Optimization | RLangtry | SU2 | 2 | August 5, 2014 10:48 |
Problem with restart solution in shape_optimization.py | robyTKD | SU2 Shape Design | 21 | May 29, 2013 10:26 |
incompressible airfoil simualtion | vyom | FLUENT | 5 | September 20, 2005 21:50 |