CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Calculation time - solving time

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree6Likes
  • 1 Post By wsh
  • 5 Post By miladghasemi

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 9, 2015, 21:49
Default Calculation time - solving time
  #1
wsh
New Member
 
Dobromił Pszenny
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 11
wsh is on a distinguished road
Hi,
is it possible to check solving time in Fluent? I mean time beetwen clicking "calculate" button and "calculation complete" statement. Without using barbarian-style method like stopwatch, of course
flotus1 likes this.
wsh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 10, 2015, 14:38
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,746
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
I don't know how to do it in serial mode but in parallel mode from the GUI you can click on Parallel>Timer>Usage and it will print the wall time and cpu time. In TUI you just use /parallel/timer/usage
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 10, 2015, 15:47
Default
  #3
wsh
New Member
 
Dobromił Pszenny
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 11
wsh is on a distinguished road
Thanks Lucky,

i don't know much about using parallel mode - how does it affect my simulation? I am using Fluent to simple transient simulation and in serial mode after ~10 iterations solution is converged but in parallel mode Fluent is not stopping calculation even after 200 iterations... I am running it in 1 process - how much should I use?

Quote:
Performance Timer for 450 iterations on 1 compute node
Average wall-clock time per iteration: 0.010 sec
Global reductions per iteration: 36 ops
Global reductions time per iteration: 0.000 sec (0.0%)
Message count per iteration: 4 messages
Data transfer per iteration: 0.000 MB
LE solves per iteration: 4 solves
LE wall-clock time per iteration: 0.004 sec (37.1%)
LE global solves per iteration: 0 solves
LE global wall-clock time per iteration: 0.000 sec (0.0%)
LE global matrix maximum size: 0
AMG cycles per iteration: 6.033 cycles
Relaxation sweeps per iteration: 157 sweeps
Relaxation exchanges per iteration: 0 exchanges
Time-step updates per iteration: 0.02 updates
Time-step wall-clock time per iteration: 0.000 sec (0.0%)

Total wall-clock time: 4.706 sec
I can't see here anything which is simillar to calculation time, "Total wall-clocl time" has too small value.

EDIT: I have tried command "solver-cpu-time" also, but Fluent is returning "invalid command".
wsh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 10, 2015, 16:19
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,746
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
Total wall clock time should be what you are looking for.

There's almost no difference between serial or parallel if you are only running on 1 process, so I have no clue why you solution doesn't converge when running in parallel mode. Algorithmically there is no difference, except that the communication between the head node and compute node is now done via mpi rather than direct communication.

Mesh partitioning occurs if you run on more than 1 processes (by default it generates one partition per process). The partitioning causes some differences in discretization at the partition boundary, but the effect should be minor.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2016, 09:30
Exclamation Don't forget ()
  #5
New Member
 
milad
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
miladghasemi is on a distinguished road
The right format of this command is " (solver-cpu-time) ", you must type ().
reza2031, encoced, MikhO and 2 others like this.
miladghasemi is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Courant Number @ icoFoam Artex85 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 February 16, 2017 14:40
simpleFoam error - "Floating point exception" mbcx4jc2 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 4, 2015 03:20
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? sharonyue OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 14 August 26, 2013 08:47
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions Heroic OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 26 December 17, 2012 04:34
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence jonmec OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 July 28, 2011 06:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:28.