|
[Sponsors] |
September 3, 2015, 11:37 |
Negative moment coefficient
|
#1 |
New Member
Ronald Thompson
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
I'm running transient analysis on a three bladed vertical axis wind turbine in 2d using fluent, the issue i'm having is that the moment coefficient is fluctuating between positive and negative values, See attached. I also have attached plots of the mesh and a pressure contour which shows no large discontinuities. Im using the transitional turbulence model with a "simple" scheme and second order upwind. I have my reference values set up as follows Depth = 1 Length = radius of turbine Area = diameter of Turbine X length of blades. If anyone could provide me with help it would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance |
|
September 7, 2015, 07:38 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Ronald Thompson
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Can anybody assist? it's been wrecking my head for a long time now,
thanks |
|
September 14, 2015, 07:19 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Ronald Thompson
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
||
September 15, 2015, 02:24 |
|
#4 |
Member
Bharat
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 49
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Thompson,
i am not sure/conclude with data you have provided. but for your better understanding please go through this tutorial. http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ans...-tutorial.html hope this will help. cheers, bharat
__________________
chapter 3: -crossing the threshold- |
|
September 15, 2015, 07:03 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Ronald Thompson
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Bharatt,
Thank you for your reply. unfortunately the link to the web site provided is dead, however when i was initially setting up my model I followed the instructions provided by daysley in the .doc file. This is why I'm thinking the issue may be down to how I have defined my reference values? Could you have a look at how I have them defined and let me know. Very much appreciate your help |
|
September 15, 2015, 11:41 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Andrew Kokemoor
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 14 |
If you're unsure of your reference values, you can always look at the raw moment data and calculate the moment coefficient yourself. If it doesn't match what Fluent reports, then something's off.
In this case, though, reference values definitely aren't the problem. Reference values are just scaling dimensions; they won't change the sign. It looks to me like your oscillations are decreasing each cycle, do they get better if you solve farther? I don't know much about VAWTs, but it seems plausible that that could be the correct behavior. How does the time-averaged power match the theory? |
|
September 24, 2015, 15:47 |
|
#7 | |
New Member
Adriana
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 14 |
Quote:
|
||
September 24, 2015, 17:02 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Ahmed Jalal
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 11 |
You said it is a transient problem. How long are you running this for?
Try increasing the time steps for your solution to stabilize as it looks like the differences are decreasing. |
|
October 27, 2015, 18:11 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Ronald Thompson
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Folks thanks for your replies to my problem
[QUOTE In this case, though, reference values definitely aren't the problem. Reference values are just scaling dimensions; they won't change the sign. It looks to me like your oscillations are decreasing each cycle, do they get better if you solve farther? I don't know much about VAWTs, but it seems plausible that that could be the correct behavior. How does the time-averaged power match the theory?[/QUOTE] Thanks for explaining why the reference values aren't the problem, I have run the solution for sufficient time for 4 full turbine rotations to occur, and my solution doesn't really get much better, I am not looking for the solution to converge just that I get a positive cm average for the last rotation as I'm neglecting the first three. I personally taught my mesh was sufficient what is your opinion on this? where else could I be having a problem. Thanks for this but it didn't fix my problem unfortunately |
|
July 18, 2020, 03:11 |
|
#10 |
New Member
Harshi Bavishi
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 6 |
While analysing a 3D wing what is reference radius in moment calculation of a wing?
|
|
Tags |
fluent 14.5, moment coefficient, monitors, negative moment, vawt wind turbine |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] mesh airfoil NACA0012 | anand_30 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 13 | March 7, 2022 18:22 |
[blockMesh] non-orthogonal faces and incorrect orientation? | nennbs | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | April 17, 2013 06:42 |
[blockMesh] error message with modeling a cube with a hold at the center | hsingtzu | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 14, 2012 10:56 |
[blockMesh] BlockMesh FOAM warning | gaottino | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | July 19, 2010 15:11 |
[blockMesh] Axisymmetrical mesh | Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | April 2, 2007 15:00 |