CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

problem in validation on naca 0012

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 26, 2015, 07:29
Default problem in validation on naca 0012
  #1
New Member
 
mahdi
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
mahdi_sangbori is on a distinguished road
hello everyone
i am simulating naca 0012 with ansys fluent.
i am trying all of the turbulent models(like spallart,k-e , k-w sst , and transition sst models),the conclusion was that the best model is sst transition and k-w sst.
in transition sst model bubble is showed but in k-w sst it doesnt .
y+ in my calculating is below1 and i have used c-grid, bundry condition is that the left and bottom surface is the inlet and the straight right and upper surface are pressure outlet .
Re is about 8*10^4
i am simulating in low re numbers and M=0.023 v=8m/s.
i have got some problem
first of all i have no results that i can use them to valid my solution in this Re number .
the second problem is that(when i compare the solution of the theory wing section book i found out that the in range of reynolds number the Cl is the same at the Re number shown! in angle of 8 is about 0.8) when i compare my Cl that is 0.06 i found out that i have got some mistake


please help
sorry of my bad english
mahdi_sangbori is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 07:59
Default
  #2
Member
 
Eduardo Tola
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Madrid/Haifa
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 11
edu_aero is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahdi_sangbori View Post
hello everyone
i am simulating naca 0012 with ansys fluent.
i am trying all of the turbulent models(like spallart,k-e , k-w sst , and transition sst models),the conclusion was that the best model is sst transition and k-w sst.
in transition sst model bubble is showed but in k-w sst it doesnt .
y+ in my calculating is below1 and i have used c-grid, bundry condition is that the left and bottom surface is the inlet and the straight right and upper surface are pressure outlet .
Re is about 8*10^4
i am simulating in low re numbers and M=0.023 v=8m/s.
i have got some problem
first of all i have no results that i can use them to valid my solution in this Re number .
the second problem is that(when i compare the solution of the theory wing section book i found out that the in range of reynolds number the Cl is the same at the Re number shown! in angle of 8 is about 0.8) when i compare my Cl that is 0.06 i found out that i have got some mistake


please help
sorry of my bad english
Firstly, in order to compare it u can do it with a software called XFOIL (totally free), or by some aerodynamic numeric models. I have some on Excel and Matlab, but u should know the model in order to use it and change according to your neccesities.

Abour the Cl, it seems like the adimensionalization is not done correcty, have u checked it?
__________________
Having fun with CFD =)
edu_aero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:02
Default
  #3
New Member
 
mahdi
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
mahdi_sangbori is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by edu_aero View Post
Firstly, in order to compare it u can do it with a software called XFOIL (totally free), or by some aerodynamic numeric models. I have some on Excel and Matlab, but u should know the model in order to use it and change according to your neccesities.

Abour the Cl, it seems like the adimensionalization is not done correcty, have u checked it?
hi Eduardo
thanks for your response
Cl that i get is from here : report,forces, and the vector that is

Perpendicular to the velocity vector.am i right?
i dont know anything about xfoil and what you said for validation,would you please help me more about validation, in models that i have used,k-w and transition were better than other but transition sst was showing the sepration bubble and other models did not!
i am using steady state to calculating!

mahdi_sangbori is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:10
Default
  #4
Member
 
Eduardo Tola
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Madrid/Haifa
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 11
edu_aero is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahdi_sangbori View Post
hi Eduardo
thanks for your response
Cl that i get is from here : report,forces, and the vector that is

Perpendicular to the velocity vector.am i right?
i dont know anything about xfoil and what you said for validation,would you please help me more about validation, in models that i have used,k-w and transition were better than other but transition sst was showing the sepration bubble and other models did not!
i am using steady state to calculating!

Yes, perpendicular to velocity.


About validation, is quite tough, the program that I told u, may be u can dinf a tutorial on the Internet. It is only for Nacas and easy to used. And about the other... it is quite complicated if u haven't studied them in an Aerodynamics subject.

However, about the models, I can help u out. I was doing some simulations about the performances of a cycling wheel and used a paper called 'Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model' (About SST Transition Model) and 'Improved Two-Equation k-omegaTurbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows'.

U will find there everything that u need it
__________________
Having fun with CFD =)
edu_aero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:30
Default
  #5
New Member
 
mahdi
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
mahdi_sangbori is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by edu_aero View Post
Yes, perpendicular to velocity.


About validation, is quite tough, the program that I told u, may be u can dinf a tutorial on the Internet. It is only for Nacas and easy to used. And about the other... it is quite complicated if u haven't studied them in an Aerodynamics subject.

However, about the models, I can help u out. I was doing some simulations about the performances of a cycling wheel and used a paper called 'Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model' (About SST Transition Model) and 'Improved Two-Equation k-omegaTurbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows'.

U will find there everything that u need it
xfoil shows Cl=0.9640!
mahdi_sangbori is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:34
Default
  #6
Member
 
Eduardo Tola
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Madrid/Haifa
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 11
edu_aero is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahdi_sangbori View Post
xfoil shows Cl=0.9640!
Then look for your error, probably your choir is not 1m or something realted with adimensionalization.

About the y+ value, do the inflation operation on the Mesh and everything will be alright. Because y+ depends of the wide of the first layer
__________________
Having fun with CFD =)
edu_aero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:41
Default
  #7
New Member
 
mahdi
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
mahdi_sangbori is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by edu_aero View Post
Then look for your error, probably your choir is not 1m or something realted with adimensionalization.

About the y+ value, do the inflation operation on the Mesh and everything will be alright. Because y+ depends of the wide of the first layer
my chord is 0.15 m
mahdi_sangbori is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:42
Default
  #8
Member
 
Eduardo Tola
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Madrid/Haifa
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 11
edu_aero is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahdi_sangbori View Post
my chord is 0.15 m
and are u dividing by that lenght?
__________________
Having fun with CFD =)
edu_aero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2015, 09:51
Default
  #9
New Member
 
mahdi
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
mahdi_sangbori is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by edu_aero View Post
and are u dividing by that lenght?
sorry i dont understand what you mean!
in xfoil?
Re number is calculated with this chord , should i import it ?
if you mean in ansys, i scaled there
mahdi_sangbori is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2015, 17:40
Default
  #10
New Member
 
mahdi
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 11
mahdi_sangbori is on a distinguished road
hi every one
my problem solved with ansys help finally
thank you all
mahdi_sangbori is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
ansys, fluent, naca0012, problem, validation


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to import NACA 0012 Profile in Gridgen maplepink Main CFD Forum 17 May 7, 2013 14:01
Validation of NACA 0012 pressure and velocity contour Tom Lucius FLUENT 1 December 27, 2011 22:49
Incomplete NACA 0012 profile Rif Main CFD Forum 1 January 10, 2008 03:45
NACA 0012 Mesh Alex FLUENT 4 March 29, 2006 00:34
NACA 0012 simulation results Luis FLUENT 3 February 15, 2006 12:42


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:16.