CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Turbulence model for transition

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 6, 2015, 10:42
Default Turbulence model for transition
  #1
New Member
 
Hannes
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11
Stormbringer505 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,

I am working on my master thesis which is about CFD modeling and improving a woodchip boiler's water jacket.

I've already created a mesh, mostly hex cells where heat transfer is relevant, and now I am running some simulations to determine the flow field within the water jacket as a start before I add the combustion/energy equation.

I am having trouble simulating the flow (using Ansys Fluent 15.0). On the in- and outlet pipes the Re-number is about 27.000 so this flow is fully turbulent but there are areas in the waterjacket that are going to be laminar. I can't determine exactly where they are so I can't just slice them out and add a laminar zone to them.

Some of the fluid zones are large but thin, for example 1.2 x 1.2 meters but only about 30mm thick (or 3x3 feet with a thickness of one inch in imperial). I have created five to seven cells across the thickness to keep the cell number low, it is already about five million.

Now, there's the problem: I am really not shure which turbulence model can be used in this case. I have thought about some possibilities but I want to hear the opinion of further experienced people on them:

a) Do fully laminar calculations?
I guess the results won't be very good.

b) Add a turbulence model with wall functions?
Right now I am running a simulation using the realizable k-epsilon-model with enhanced wall treatment. Only looking at the residual monitors it seems to work fine but I know that low residuals do not necessarily mean that the solution is correct. I will examine this tomorrow and let Fluent do some more iterations on it. I am running on the pressure based coupled solver with a CFL of 200 and 2nd order discretisation (1st order is unstable as I've seen so far).

In the beginning I was running on the SST k-omega-model with low Re-correction but the residuals for continuity wouldn't go below 1e-1 which is, in my opinion, not very good in this case. I've done some reading since them and I've learned that I need to set a finer mesh to resolve the boundary layer with this model, am I right?

c) Use a transition model
I haven't tried this yet and it is completely new to me. I've read that transition models also need a fine mesh to resolve the boundary layer, is that true?

I hope you guys can give me some advice. Even though I am working on a pretty powerful computer at the university calculation times are long and since literature does not simply say "use this or that model" I hope some experience might help.

Thank you!
Stormbringer505 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling adilsyyed CFX 15 June 24, 2015 20:42
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids ashtonJ CFX 6 August 11, 2014 15:32
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: volo87 CFX 5 June 14, 2013 18:44
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model FelixL OpenFOAM Bugs 27 March 27, 2012 10:02
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model YJZ ANSYS 1 August 20, 2010 14:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:04.