|
[Sponsors] |
August 6, 2015, 10:42 |
Turbulence model for transition
|
#1 |
New Member
Hannes
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello everyone,
I am working on my master thesis which is about CFD modeling and improving a woodchip boiler's water jacket. I've already created a mesh, mostly hex cells where heat transfer is relevant, and now I am running some simulations to determine the flow field within the water jacket as a start before I add the combustion/energy equation. I am having trouble simulating the flow (using Ansys Fluent 15.0). On the in- and outlet pipes the Re-number is about 27.000 so this flow is fully turbulent but there are areas in the waterjacket that are going to be laminar. I can't determine exactly where they are so I can't just slice them out and add a laminar zone to them. Some of the fluid zones are large but thin, for example 1.2 x 1.2 meters but only about 30mm thick (or 3x3 feet with a thickness of one inch in imperial). I have created five to seven cells across the thickness to keep the cell number low, it is already about five million. Now, there's the problem: I am really not shure which turbulence model can be used in this case. I have thought about some possibilities but I want to hear the opinion of further experienced people on them: a) Do fully laminar calculations? I guess the results won't be very good. b) Add a turbulence model with wall functions? Right now I am running a simulation using the realizable k-epsilon-model with enhanced wall treatment. Only looking at the residual monitors it seems to work fine but I know that low residuals do not necessarily mean that the solution is correct. I will examine this tomorrow and let Fluent do some more iterations on it. I am running on the pressure based coupled solver with a CFL of 200 and 2nd order discretisation (1st order is unstable as I've seen so far). In the beginning I was running on the SST k-omega-model with low Re-correction but the residuals for continuity wouldn't go below 1e-1 which is, in my opinion, not very good in this case. I've done some reading since them and I've learned that I need to set a finer mesh to resolve the boundary layer with this model, am I right? c) Use a transition model I haven't tried this yet and it is completely new to me. I've read that transition models also need a fine mesh to resolve the boundary layer, is that true? I hope you guys can give me some advice. Even though I am working on a pretty powerful computer at the university calculation times are long and since literature does not simply say "use this or that model" I hope some experience might help. Thank you! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Error in Two phase (condensation) modeling | adilsyyed | CFX | 15 | June 24, 2015 20:42 |
Overflow Error in Multiphase Modelling with Two Continuous Fluids | ashtonJ | CFX | 6 | August 11, 2014 15:32 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
Wrong calculation of nut in the kOmegaSST turbulence model | FelixL | OpenFOAM Bugs | 27 | March 27, 2012 10:02 |
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 14:57 |