|
[Sponsors] |
Influence of the boundary layer refinement on convergence |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 18, 2015, 06:54 |
Influence of the boundary layer refinement on convergence
|
#1 |
New Member
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone!
This is my first thread in a forum, so I apologize for possible mistakes like posting this in the wrong place. Also I´m not a native english speaker. I´m working on a 2D simulation of a flow through cascade with sheet metal blades, but i am quite new to CFD (about half a year) and have a few questions. I made a structured grid using ICEM CFD and realized that minor differences in the refinement of the near wall region have an influence on wether my solution converges using Spalart-Almaras or k-omega SST as turbulence model in ANSYS FLUENT. With 40 layers in the near wall region plus linear refinement to the wall I achieve convergence only with k-omega SST, while using 40 layers in the near wall region without any kind of refinement in wall direction leads to convergence only with Spalart-Almaras. Also using 30 layers without refinement will cause a faster drop in residual decrease. (I used for every approach second order upwind interpolation scheme). So my question is just how this is possible? I never would´ve thought that this small differences could cause non-convergence for one turbulence model, but lead to convergence for an other one. Greetings |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radiation in semi-transparent media with surface-to-surface model? | mpeppels | CFX | 11 | August 22, 2019 08:30 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh Boundary Layer at Corner | panpanzhong | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | July 3, 2018 06:53 |
[snappyHexMesh] refinementRegions ignored | Jeanp | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | June 12, 2014 06:05 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
errors | Fahad | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 23, 2004 14:20 |