|
[Sponsors] |
May 18, 2015, 19:16 |
Too small time step?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 15 |
Hello,
I'm calculating heat transfer from hot air flow to a thin metal wire. Model is transient, and what I'm trying to find is a temperature response (step response) of mentioned wire. In theory I should get something like this: Model is defined quite precisely, but results are strongly depenent on time step size. Air flow speed is constant almost everywhere and equal to 5m/s. The smallest cell has size of 0.001mm. It is so small because metal wire is 0.01mm in diameter. According to this data I set up the time step to 2e-7s, but results were completly ridiculous. I have prepared comparison of solutions with different time step sizes. It seems that solution which is the closest to experimental data is for time step much bigger than 2e-7s. Could you tell me why it is so, and how should I find the proper time step? Thank you for any of your help |
|
Tags |
time step size |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 05:13 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
dynamic Mesh is faster than MRF???? | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | August 26, 2013 08:47 |
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour. | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 13 | January 2, 2013 23:40 |
pisoFoam with k-epsilon turb blows up - Some questions | Heroic | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 26 | December 17, 2012 04:34 |