|
[Sponsors] |
April 16, 2015, 07:21 |
Problem setup of a rigid body
|
#1 |
New Member
Ahmed Abdel Samad
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11 |
Hello everyone,
I'm pretty new to FLUENT however I've some basic knowledge that I had couple of simulations running.. from the key point that a correct problem setup is very important in having accurate results and a converged solution I want couple of help on my problem setup: first of all I'm simulating a helical micro swimmer with an attached magnet, a full rigid body to be correct in a channel, 3D simulation. what you should know the helical swimmer is pretty much small, the total length is around 2mm and helix diameter around 0.5 mm. so my current setup is: 1. The swimmer is defined as a wall inside an enclosure which is pretty big compared to the size of the robot cylinder radius is r = 25 mm and length L = 25 mm, 2. the mesh is pretty much basic here are the details: 1591798 tetrahedral cells, zone 3, binary. 1591798 cell partition ids, zone 3, 4 partitions, binary. 3150278 triangular interior faces, zone 2, binary. 2270 triangular wall faces, zone 1, binary. 63890 triangular wall faces, zone 8, binary. 238 triangular pressure-outlet faces, zone 7, binary. 238 triangular velocity-inlet faces, zone 6, binary. 284959 nodes, binary. 284959 node flags, binary. 3. Pressure based solver 4. I use standard k-epsilon model with default values. 5. Inlet velocity of 1 m/s and gauge pressure of 0 Pa 6. Outlet gauge pressure is also 0 Pa 7. the wall of the robot is specified to be rotating at 5 rad/s (I want to simulate from 5 rad/s till 100 rad/s to plot a graph of rad/s and net moments and forces) around 400 iterations I reach a converged solution, however at enclosure of 30 mm radius and length of cylinder I didn't get a converged solution message at even 20,000 iterations. My questions are: *Is the enclosure/domain okay? or big? should it be smaller? (smaller means lower number of iterations for converged solution message) *Is the model I'm using okay? or should I use another turbulence model? because it's a low Reynolds number? *When I say that the wall is rotating, does it move at a certain axial velocity because of propulsive force? or remains stationary? should I define the wall functions using a UDF to specify that the wall is rigid body and allows all 6DOF motion? Thanks a lot in advance, I'm using the simulation before I go to practical tests as we are working on a research paper. |
|
April 16, 2015, 23:04 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 14 |
can you give us some pictures of model?
|
|
April 17, 2015, 12:08 |
Here you go!
|
#3 |
New Member
Ahmed Abdel Samad
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 11 |
||
Tags |
fluent 14 to fluent 15., rigid body, rigid body motion |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6-dof rigid body solver | AUN | CFX | 4 | October 3, 2017 20:49 |
Problem with rigid body motion | ghost82 | EnSight | 11 | March 12, 2015 10:22 |
Waterwheel shaped turbine inside a pipe simulation problem | mshahed91 | CFX | 3 | January 10, 2015 12:19 |
Rigid body motion on transient fluent mrf | ghost82 | EnSight | 4 | September 6, 2014 12:24 |
force convergence problems in CFX 6DOF rigid body solver | ajay_ks | CFX | 8 | March 25, 2013 05:02 |