|
[Sponsors] |
December 19, 2014, 12:39 |
NACA 0012 (3D) strange results?
|
#1 |
New Member
aleix de toro diaz
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi friends!
Im new on this forum, I've started learning fluent because i need to make a final project designing a plane for my final degree. I am starting with a NACA 0012 (in 3d ). Firstly i am introducing a velocity inlet of 30 m/s, and inviscid flow model. I have done it with 0 AngleOfAttack ( on boundary conditions X=-30 m/s) With 5 AOA (X=-30 cos (5), Y=0, Z=-30sin (5)) and with 10 AOA (X=-30cos(10), Y=0, Z=-30sin(10)) I have attached 3 plots of velocities for the three angles, I think it is really strange that the stagnation point (where the velocity is 0 m/s), when I change the angle of attack does not varies. Are these results bad? The other two plots show the coefficients of pressures around the naca (for this part I have created an Iso surface, selecting mesh and Y coordinate from the airfoil surface). For the results, I think there is almost no difference and it should be more difference. Moreover, the results for 5 AOA (Cd=0.027117317 and Cl=0.30893708) 10 AOA (Cd= 0.10493012 and Cl=0.59508828 ) I think that the value of the Cd (0.10492012) is not very reasonable. What do you think about the results? Thank you |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2D NACA 0012 Airfoil Validation Case (NASA) | jp3g12 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 24 | April 23, 2021 15:34 |
Simulate NACA 0012 Wing | nvtrieu | FLUENT | 20 | February 7, 2016 11:54 |
How to import NACA 0012 Profile in Gridgen | maplepink | Main CFD Forum | 17 | May 7, 2013 14:01 |
NACA 2408 Comparative results. | Saran1991 | Main CFD Forum | 4 | January 22, 2013 13:44 |
NACA 0012 simulation results | Luis | FLUENT | 3 | February 15, 2006 12:42 |