|
[Sponsors] |
Uplus vs Yplus with K-Epsilon Turbulent Model in Fluent |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 29, 2014, 07:43 |
Uplus vs Yplus with K-Epsilon Turbulent Model in Fluent
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
I am having extreme difficulty getting this to work. Likely because I have no clue what I am doing.
2D problem. I am required to compare the law-of-the wall profile to the Uplus v Yplus computed in fluent for a K-Epsilon turbulent flow, kinda like whats shown here http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...-vs-yplus.html. Fluent gives Yplus but not Uplus. I tried defining Uplus as a Custom Field Function. Cannot get it to work - the contour plot gives zero (0) through out the whole fluid domain. I am expressing Uplus as |V|/Utau, where Utau=sqrt(x-wall-shear/density). The unnerving part is that Utau is not 0 near the wall(expected) and some distance from it and Velocity is only 0 at the wall (no slip). So why am I getting 0 EVERYWHERE through-out the fluid domain? I am also having excessively large Yplus values reaching 700. I cannot refer to the source thread, but on these forums I've read that that would be due to high TKE. I have flow an inlet flow velocity of 30m/s and a hydraulic diameter of 0.177m. Re=354000. In the K-E setup I set TKE as 1.42m^2/s^2, but contour plots show TKE upto 40 in some places. Please advise. |
|
October 31, 2014, 01:00 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66 |
The yplus value that Fluent gives you is only the yplus of the wall adjacent cell, also sometimes called wall y+. Fluent does not give you y+for any of the interior cells that are not directly adjacent to walls.
Try not to confuse this wall y+ with the canonical y+, which is closely related to the cell Reynolds number. utau is a surface property whereas u+ and y+ are fields. My guess is you are trying dividing u(x,y,z) by utau which is defined only on the surface. Since utau is not defined on the interior, it it should not report any values there. Garbage in, Garbage out. |
|
December 17, 2022, 13:08 |
U plus
|
#3 |
New Member
adam
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 8 |
good hi
I have same problem how can i draw fluent u+ vs Y+ graph in cfd-post fluent if you found a solution please send me. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models | Jade M | Main CFD Forum | 40 | January 27, 2023 08:18 |
k-omega-SST model (OF 1.6) - turbulent flat plate | cboss | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 25 | August 9, 2016 10:53 |
Is it possible to model natural convection in a 2D horizontal model in fluent | caitoc | FLUENT | 1 | May 5, 2014 14:32 |
What turbulent flow model choose in Fluent | ja.maldonado1187 | FLUENT | 2 | August 11, 2013 07:33 |
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model | YJZ | ANSYS | 1 | August 20, 2010 14:57 |