CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > FLUENT

Uplus vs Yplus with K-Epsilon Turbulent Model in Fluent

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 29, 2014, 07:43
Default Uplus vs Yplus with K-Epsilon Turbulent Model in Fluent
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
sandpants is on a distinguished road
I am having extreme difficulty getting this to work. Likely because I have no clue what I am doing.

2D problem.

I am required to compare the law-of-the wall profile to the Uplus v Yplus computed in fluent for a K-Epsilon turbulent flow, kinda like whats shown here http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/flu...-vs-yplus.html.

Fluent gives Yplus but not Uplus.

I tried defining Uplus as a Custom Field Function. Cannot get it to work - the contour plot gives zero (0) through out the whole fluid domain.
I am expressing Uplus as |V|/Utau, where Utau=sqrt(x-wall-shear/density).

The unnerving part is that Utau is not 0 near the wall(expected) and some distance from it and Velocity is only 0 at the wall (no slip). So why am I getting 0 EVERYWHERE through-out the fluid domain?

I am also having excessively large Yplus values reaching 700. I cannot refer to the source thread, but on these forums I've read that that would be due to high TKE. I have flow an inlet flow velocity of 30m/s and a hydraulic diameter of 0.177m. Re=354000. In the K-E setup I set TKE as 1.42m^2/s^2, but contour plots show TKE upto 40 in some places.

Please advise.
sandpants is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 31, 2014, 01:00
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lucky
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 5,761
Rep Power: 66
LuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura aboutLuckyTran has a spectacular aura about
The yplus value that Fluent gives you is only the yplus of the wall adjacent cell, also sometimes called wall y+. Fluent does not give you y+for any of the interior cells that are not directly adjacent to walls.

Try not to confuse this wall y+ with the canonical y+, which is closely related to the cell Reynolds number.

utau is a surface property whereas u+ and y+ are fields. My guess is you are trying dividing u(x,y,z) by utau which is defined only on the surface. Since utau is not defined on the interior, it it should not report any values there.

Garbage in, Garbage out.
LuckyTran is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 17, 2022, 13:08
Default U plus
  #3
New Member
 
adam
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 8
medguedem is on a distinguished road
good hi
I have same problem how can i draw fluent u+ vs Y+ graph in cfd-post fluent
if you found a solution please send me.
medguedem is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of k-epsilon and k-omega Models Jade M Main CFD Forum 40 January 27, 2023 08:18
k-omega-SST model (OF 1.6) - turbulent flat plate cboss OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 25 August 9, 2016 10:53
Is it possible to model natural convection in a 2D horizontal model in fluent caitoc FLUENT 1 May 5, 2014 14:32
What turbulent flow model choose in Fluent ja.maldonado1187 FLUENT 2 August 11, 2013 07:33
Low Reynolds k-epsilon model YJZ ANSYS 1 August 20, 2010 14:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:52.